{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ","short_pith_number":"pith:N2POHSGF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6e9ee3c8c5f7745d41de02b9322fd17e4c422d1c4c77ffcece61fcbfd106f425","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2104.13730","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Causes of Effects: Learning individual responses from population data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Ang Li, Judea Pearl, Scott Mueller","submitted_at":"2021-04-28T12:38:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"The problem of individualization is recognized as crucial in almost every field. Identifying causes of effects in specific events is likewise essential for accurate decision making. However, such estimates invoke counterfactual relationships, and are therefore indeterminable from population data. For example, the probability of benefiting from a treatment concerns an individual having a favorable outcome if treated and an unfavorable outcome if untreated. Experiments conditioning on fine-grained features are fundamentally inadequate because we can't test both possibilities for an individual. T"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2104.13730","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2021-04-28T12:38:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"21255df304ea55ed0eb00e66d25be34c659e7813e642d07f261898e864791632","abstract_canon_sha256":"1278c882d538a380e65e3257a983dd481b2e122332e91c8eaeb7ba06911234ba"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.497020Z","signature_b64":"JtwDjYuJi0vDVEvooWjfziiEaYvQIyWg1sHJfrX+S+V8YsqJA2KcDoNW0VkMcmLczODDy7XSGqfHDbYQYmbgDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6e9ee3c8c5f7745d41de02b9322fd17e4c422d1c4c77ffcece61fcbfd106f425","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.496599Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.496599Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Causes of Effects: Learning individual responses from population data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Ang Li, Judea Pearl, Scott Mueller","submitted_at":"2021-04-28T12:38:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"The problem of individualization is recognized as crucial in almost every field. Identifying causes of effects in specific events is likewise essential for accurate decision making. However, such estimates invoke counterfactual relationships, and are therefore indeterminable from population data. For example, the probability of benefiting from a treatment concerns an individual having a favorable outcome if treated and an unfavorable outcome if untreated. Experiments conditioning on fine-grained features are fundamentally inadequate because we can't test both possibilities for an individual. T"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2104.13730","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2104.13730/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2104.13730","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.496668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2104.13730v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.496668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2104.13730","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.496668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"N2POHSGF652F","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.496668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"N2POHSGF652F2QO6","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.496668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"N2POHSGF","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.496668+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.07469","citing_title":"Individual Treatment Effect: Prediction Intervals and Sharp Bounds","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N2POHSGF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N2POHSGF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2104.13730&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/N2POHSGF652F2QO6AK4TEL6RPZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.496668+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:36:50.496668+00:00"}