{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR","short_pith_number":"pith:N52UWQFV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6f754b40b59aad188c7dc329a2814d846a335432e87d6a5bfe73dd6cc8267ceb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2207.07068","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Survey","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Federica Sarro, Jie M. Zhang, Mark Harman, Max Hort, Zhenpeng Chen","submitted_at":"2022-07-14T17:16:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper provides a comprehensive survey of bias mitigation methods for achieving fairness in Machine Learning (ML) models. We collect a total of 341 publications concerning bias mitigation for ML classifiers. These methods can be distinguished based on their intervention procedure (i.e., pre-processing, in-processing, post-processing) and the technique they apply. We investigate how existing bias mitigation methods are evaluated in the literature. In particular, we consider datasets, metrics and benchmarking. Based on the gathered insights (e.g., What is the most popular fairness metric? Ho"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2207.07068","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2022-07-14T17:16:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a9e27c34482121a49954b76778272d615610fa782b32583eed878fa518ccbfc0","abstract_canon_sha256":"8c5c6aa0cf454d2aba064e30b6604cd55655cb80e1b94a04b148f4f611169dc3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.500252Z","signature_b64":"yjwCqoPxoW8NNzVzCta7cvpnXyFeezXZSRG+8MfeaI+35nDLeRxEeiiXCwZexpvwc77/ktDHuuG4341/wot6CQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6f754b40b59aad188c7dc329a2814d846a335432e87d6a5bfe73dd6cc8267ceb","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.499734Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.499734Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Survey","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Federica Sarro, Jie M. Zhang, Mark Harman, Max Hort, Zhenpeng Chen","submitted_at":"2022-07-14T17:16:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper provides a comprehensive survey of bias mitigation methods for achieving fairness in Machine Learning (ML) models. We collect a total of 341 publications concerning bias mitigation for ML classifiers. These methods can be distinguished based on their intervention procedure (i.e., pre-processing, in-processing, post-processing) and the technique they apply. We investigate how existing bias mitigation methods are evaluated in the literature. In particular, we consider datasets, metrics and benchmarking. Based on the gathered insights (e.g., What is the most popular fairness metric? Ho"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2207.07068","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2207.07068/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2207.07068","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.499809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2207.07068v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.499809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2207.07068","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.499809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"N52UWQFVTKWR","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.499809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.499809+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"N52UWQFV","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.499809+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23204","citing_title":"Unmasking LAION-5B: Age, Gender, Race, and Emotion Biases in Large-Scale Image Datasets","ref_index":194,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08964","citing_title":"Trustworthy AI: Ensuring Reliability and Accountability from Models to Agents","ref_index":74,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16450","citing_title":"Evaluating Intersectional Fairness across Clinical Machine Learning Use Cases using Fairlogue and the All of Us Research Program","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.04858","citing_title":"FairLogue: A Toolkit for Intersectional Fairness Analysis in Clinical Machine Learning Models","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N52UWQFV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N52UWQFV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2207.07068&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/N52UWQFVTKWRRDD5YMU2FAKNQR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.499809+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:59:27.499809+00:00"}