{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P","short_pith_number":"pith:N5J7I6GA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6f53f478c05af03e270779f45301b9dbc8b150f0cd2fb9898a4f2970e39107d5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1605.04424","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Hanbury-Brown and Twiss effect without quantum interference in photon counting regime","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.optics","authors_text":"Bin Bai, Fuli Li, Huai bin Zheng, Hui Chen, Jian bin Liu, Rui feng Liu, Yun long Wang, Yu Zhou, Zhuo Xu","submitted_at":"2016-05-14T14:42:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Usually HBT effect can be interpreted by classical (intensity fluctuation correlation) and quantum (interference of two-photon probability amplitudes) theories properly at the same time. In this manuscript, we report a deliberately designed experiment in which two chaotic light beams has the same intensity fluctuation but mutual-orthogonal polarizations to each other so there will be no interference of two-photon probability amplitudes. Classical and quantum theory give different predictions on if there should be HBT (photon bunching) effect or not in the experiment. The experiment results are"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1605.04424","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.optics","submitted_at":"2016-05-14T14:42:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a887191aafd937c645b31a9b2d5f580a750c18cb18d7b4da0b63224ffc6040f8","abstract_canon_sha256":"87d3e6ff47f9192845b122dd209e40db9c00bebafffc992eabc7a1986c8a6355"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:51.693305Z","signature_b64":"n7JEjB3EskAzohgtwB113FHNsNsjHqmgXsOAa+vmbZtVoZsJgQzQZouyihdEwaNtOsPkOomdN+5ZhBc8jv/MDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6f53f478c05af03e270779f45301b9dbc8b150f0cd2fb9898a4f2970e39107d5","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:51.692676Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:51.692676Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Hanbury-Brown and Twiss effect without quantum interference in photon counting regime","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.optics","authors_text":"Bin Bai, Fuli Li, Huai bin Zheng, Hui Chen, Jian bin Liu, Rui feng Liu, Yun long Wang, Yu Zhou, Zhuo Xu","submitted_at":"2016-05-14T14:42:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Usually HBT effect can be interpreted by classical (intensity fluctuation correlation) and quantum (interference of two-photon probability amplitudes) theories properly at the same time. In this manuscript, we report a deliberately designed experiment in which two chaotic light beams has the same intensity fluctuation but mutual-orthogonal polarizations to each other so there will be no interference of two-photon probability amplitudes. Classical and quantum theory give different predictions on if there should be HBT (photon bunching) effect or not in the experiment. The experiment results are"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1605.04424","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1605.04424","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:51.692763+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1605.04424v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:51.692763+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1605.04424","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:51.692763+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"N5J7I6GALLYD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:32.724797+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"N5J7I6GALLYD4JYH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:32.724797+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"N5J7I6GA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:32.724797+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P","json":"https://pith.science/pith/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N5J7I6GA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N5J7I6GA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1605.04424&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/N5J7I6GALLYD4JYHPH2FGANZ3P/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:51.692763+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:14:51.692763+00:00"}