{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID","short_pith_number":"pith:N6J6R6UI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6f93e8fa888760a3ff3edf2559a25440fc96f7abbc9226026479365597ef16c5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.08498","version":6},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"\"Reasoning\" with Rhetoric: On the Style-Evidence Tradeoff in LLM-Generated Counter-Arguments","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Kokil Jaidka, Preetika Verma, Svetlana Churina","submitted_at":"2024-02-13T14:53:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) play a key role in generating evidence-based and stylistic counter-arguments, yet their effectiveness in real-world applications has been underexplored. Previous research often neglects the balance between evidentiality and style, which are crucial for persuasive arguments. To address this, we evaluated the effectiveness of stylized evidence-based counter-argument generation in Counterfire, a new dataset of 38,000 counter-arguments generated by revising counter-arguments to Reddit's ChangeMyView community to follow different discursive styles. We evaluated generic "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.08498","kind":"arxiv","version":6},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-02-13T14:53:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"02499c4850a0308dcca445fe9d5efbe47d543ec5165e235211e07db8f42c4015","abstract_canon_sha256":"eb41cfaf43e910bfdb6849546b4e0dbe050d3970e8ed411c060b70a1ba5f0e69"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.714204Z","signature_b64":"11yFGYEiGgG5D0W/Lx4Q+LqGo8P54XW1r2DkshmIaEejk50xHpRp3vMHb0NUXVpEUO+R7e7+jTVaNRqjpWfqCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6f93e8fa888760a3ff3edf2559a25440fc96f7abbc9226026479365597ef16c5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.713654Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.713654Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"\"Reasoning\" with Rhetoric: On the Style-Evidence Tradeoff in LLM-Generated Counter-Arguments","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Kokil Jaidka, Preetika Verma, Svetlana Churina","submitted_at":"2024-02-13T14:53:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) play a key role in generating evidence-based and stylistic counter-arguments, yet their effectiveness in real-world applications has been underexplored. Previous research often neglects the balance between evidentiality and style, which are crucial for persuasive arguments. To address this, we evaluated the effectiveness of stylized evidence-based counter-argument generation in Counterfire, a new dataset of 38,000 counter-arguments generated by revising counter-arguments to Reddit's ChangeMyView community to follow different discursive styles. We evaluated generic "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.08498","kind":"arxiv","version":6},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.08498/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.08498","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.713713+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.08498v6","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.713713+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.08498","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.713713+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"N6J6R6UIQ5QK","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.713713+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z6","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.713713+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"N6J6R6UI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.713713+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.05206","citing_title":"ConQRet: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Argumentation with LLM Judges","ref_index":2024,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID","json":"https://pith.science/pith/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N6J6R6UI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N6J6R6UI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.08498&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/N6J6R6UIQ5QKH7Z634SVTISUID/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.713713+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:07:56.713713+00:00"}