{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL","short_pith_number":"pith:N7RRDTIA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6fe311cd006e05722824390e2ddec36ad84a7c0aac9c721cef4840311d3411e8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2004.14959","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Natural Language Premise Selection: Finding Supporting Statements for Mathematical Text","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andre Freitas, Deborah Ferreira","submitted_at":"2020-04-30T17:08:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Mathematical text is written using a combination of words and mathematical expressions. This combination, along with a specific way of structuring sentences makes it challenging for state-of-art NLP tools to understand and reason on top of mathematical discourse. In this work, we propose a new NLP task, the natural premise selection, which is used to retrieve supporting definitions and supporting propositions that are useful for generating an informal mathematical proof for a particular statement. We also make available a dataset, NL-PS, which can be used to evaluate different approaches for t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2004.14959","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2020-04-30T17:08:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"8688c932b5cc721e44d93ee1289e393b62679e366b5a6e746634cd138f1b091b","abstract_canon_sha256":"660f5f38da22d4f6e8c1de4a4f7764f030fb2e41d8ce0b12d99dcb009fe4bfd4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503771Z","signature_b64":"aS4xts0ZChjPnvhNBz6yg4ZT5SBSyp2obxRDWpWo1UJ5P2T/YfOC9jhw6+K8TA8AlFferMFvzCpfKlURdXHZCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6fe311cd006e05722824390e2ddec36ad84a7c0aac9c721cef4840311d3411e8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503423Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503423Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Natural Language Premise Selection: Finding Supporting Statements for Mathematical Text","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andre Freitas, Deborah Ferreira","submitted_at":"2020-04-30T17:08:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Mathematical text is written using a combination of words and mathematical expressions. This combination, along with a specific way of structuring sentences makes it challenging for state-of-art NLP tools to understand and reason on top of mathematical discourse. In this work, we propose a new NLP task, the natural premise selection, which is used to retrieve supporting definitions and supporting propositions that are useful for generating an informal mathematical proof for a particular statement. We also make available a dataset, NL-PS, which can be used to evaluate different approaches for t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2004.14959","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2004.14959/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2004.14959","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503479+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2004.14959v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503479+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2004.14959","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503479+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"N7RRDTIANYCX","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503479+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"N7RRDTIANYCXEKBE","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503479+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"N7RRDTIA","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503479+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.16207","citing_title":"From Informal to Formal -- Incorporating and Evaluating LLMs on Natural Language Requirements to Verifiable Formal Proofs","ref_index":2009,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N7RRDTIA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/N7RRDTIA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2004.14959&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/N7RRDTIANYCXEKBEHEHC3XWDNL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503479+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:59:31.503479+00:00"}