{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE","short_pith_number":"pith:NF5Z44PY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"697b9e71f8394678134e1c01fdbc0d691ae5e72962d91604e95600007073f0fc","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.20113","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Transforming Evidence Synthesis: A Systematic Review of the Evolution of Automated Meta-Analysis in the Age of AI","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Anuradha Mathrani, Lingbo Li, Teo Susnjak","submitted_at":"2025-04-28T00:40:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Exponential growth in scientific literature has heightened the demand for efficient evidence-based synthesis, driving the rise of the field of Automated Meta-analysis (AMA) powered by natural language processing and machine learning. This PRISMA systematic review introduces a structured framework for assessing the current state of AMA, based on screening 978 papers from 2006 to 2024, and analyzing 54 studies across diverse domains. Findings reveal a predominant focus on automating data processing (57%), such as extraction and statistical modeling, while only 17% address advanced synthesis stag"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.20113","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-04-28T00:40:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"48d2cc2b96ba08863cb53bbc9cdf7fd81dd1c20fbe16522c82e60f3882194b66","abstract_canon_sha256":"185c88a017244ff5da723759dba5c027e82a1a337e01554f0c4ba9b28d7f4837"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.793520Z","signature_b64":"+XeOhUPPua8fDKlGPJALKfEKt5/P6UCSbJBPZEXKeHLnjFxCTDj8eh8eL9TlNGvO7MNumPRnfucRBN6SaRfPAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"697b9e71f8394678134e1c01fdbc0d691ae5e72962d91604e95600007073f0fc","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.792982Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.792982Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Transforming Evidence Synthesis: A Systematic Review of the Evolution of Automated Meta-Analysis in the Age of AI","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Anuradha Mathrani, Lingbo Li, Teo Susnjak","submitted_at":"2025-04-28T00:40:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Exponential growth in scientific literature has heightened the demand for efficient evidence-based synthesis, driving the rise of the field of Automated Meta-analysis (AMA) powered by natural language processing and machine learning. This PRISMA systematic review introduces a structured framework for assessing the current state of AMA, based on screening 978 papers from 2006 to 2024, and analyzing 54 studies across diverse domains. Findings reveal a predominant focus on automating data processing (57%), such as extraction and statistical modeling, while only 17% address advanced synthesis stag"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.20113","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.20113/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.20113","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.793041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.20113v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.793041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.20113","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.793041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NF5Z44PYHFDH","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.793041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2O","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.793041+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NF5Z44PY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.793041+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05206","citing_title":"Ontology-constrained multi-LLM scoring of hypothesis support in the predictive processing literature","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NF5Z44PY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NF5Z44PY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.20113&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NF5Z44PYHFDHQE2ODQA73PANNE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.793041+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:55:36.793041+00:00"}