{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2011:NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA","short_pith_number":"pith:NF6EFPUB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"697c42be81ec3b56bdeb361767c7357808d7bdceb4275bdf07a518c67bde5910","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1110.2564","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Simple Bijective Proof of the Shape-Wilf-Equivalence of the Patterns 231 and 312","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.CO","authors_text":"Dan Saracino, Jonathan Bloom","submitted_at":"2011-10-12T03:56:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"Stankova and West proved in 2002 that the patterns 231 and 312 are shape-Wilf-equivalent. Their proof was nonbijective and fairly complicated. We give a new characterization of 231 and 312 avoiding full rook placements and use this to give a simple bijective proof of the shape-Wilf- equivalence."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1110.2564","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.CO","submitted_at":"2011-10-12T03:56:42Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"77e45aa93bca1a752f2032b4fdd6222fff63f021d08c6902a9612f3754439fc3","abstract_canon_sha256":"be5e917cb7dbaad1f68fff23f8c87824b521bbd09ce57c74361675412ed1ac0d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:47:01.346797Z","signature_b64":"NFzgHOYkV4wQQ1rSAfUr0NhCN6BDoX3z4U+erkhm3amI0xf9dm9b/BW38+ZeNnBmqp7VSvXD6GuNJ78CqkhICg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"697c42be81ec3b56bdeb361767c7357808d7bdceb4275bdf07a518c67bde5910","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:47:01.346066Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:47:01.346066Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Simple Bijective Proof of the Shape-Wilf-Equivalence of the Patterns 231 and 312","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.CO","authors_text":"Dan Saracino, Jonathan Bloom","submitted_at":"2011-10-12T03:56:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"Stankova and West proved in 2002 that the patterns 231 and 312 are shape-Wilf-equivalent. Their proof was nonbijective and fairly complicated. We give a new characterization of 231 and 312 avoiding full rook placements and use this to give a simple bijective proof of the shape-Wilf- equivalence."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1110.2564","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1110.2564","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:47:01.346217+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1110.2564v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:47:01.346217+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1110.2564","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:47:01.346217+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NF6EFPUB5Q5V","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:37.096874+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPL","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:37.096874+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NF6EFPUB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:37.096874+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NF6EFPUB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NF6EFPUB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1110.2564&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NF6EFPUB5Q5VNPPLGYLWPRZVPA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:47:01.346217+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:47:01.346217+00:00"}