{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2002:NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ","short_pith_number":"pith:NFMFYOSS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"69585c3a52a6d330da558d7140edea7649e568b3880be88b9e79f3055179f41b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"quant-ph/0205016","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantum nonlocality, Bell inequalities and the memory loophole","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Adrian Kent, Daniel Collins, Jonathan Barrett, Lucien Hardy, Sandu Popescu","submitted_at":"2002-05-03T18:04:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the analysis of experiments designed to reveal violation of Bell-type inequalities, it is usually assumed that any hidden variables associated with the nth particle pair would be independent of measurement choices and outcomes for the first $(n-1)$ pairs. Models which violate this assumption exploit what we call the {\\it memory loophole}. We focus on the strongest type of violation, which uses the {\\it 2-sided} memory loophole, in which the hidden variables for pair $n$ can depend on the previous measurement choices and outcomes in both wings of the experiment. We show that the 2-sided memo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0205016","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2002-05-03T18:04:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"84981e44d2fb97f1d4577ee2a91d27eea4ffa9cf078749de73ceda71f9f244d1","abstract_canon_sha256":"c45cb460887dc4657e05002436ac5fa46dcd49e5b7b91237cb248d54aadcdeae"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743555Z","signature_b64":"OBL23HJynkJkCnnMhcHYEtLiPzRhn4c6Ng4Ur4jzD960GdWMB8SipEJ5RYvR8sYXI2jqR4jAuenpGnlEh7FuBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"69585c3a52a6d330da558d7140edea7649e568b3880be88b9e79f3055179f41b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743050Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743050Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantum nonlocality, Bell inequalities and the memory loophole","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Adrian Kent, Daniel Collins, Jonathan Barrett, Lucien Hardy, Sandu Popescu","submitted_at":"2002-05-03T18:04:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the analysis of experiments designed to reveal violation of Bell-type inequalities, it is usually assumed that any hidden variables associated with the nth particle pair would be independent of measurement choices and outcomes for the first $(n-1)$ pairs. Models which violate this assumption exploit what we call the {\\it memory loophole}. We focus on the strongest type of violation, which uses the {\\it 2-sided} memory loophole, in which the hidden variables for pair $n$ can depend on the previous measurement choices and outcomes in both wings of the experiment. We show that the 2-sided memo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0205016","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/quant-ph/0205016/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"quant-ph/0205016","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743117+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"quant-ph/0205016v3","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743117+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0205016","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743117+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NFMFYOSSU3JT","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743117+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSV","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743117+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NFMFYOSS","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743117+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.19269","citing_title":"Information Metrics and Possible Limitations of Local Information Objectivity in Quantum Gravity","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NFMFYOSS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NFMFYOSS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=quant-ph/0205016&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NFMFYOSSU3JTBWSVRVYUB3PKOZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743117+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T16:36:03.743117+00:00"}