{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN","short_pith_number":"pith:NHGWIKWH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"69cd642ac7865e5f1d7d05cd4b2a6e137436ff52e3378b2b8a6f9456b38c7d94","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1908.09321","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Does Code Quality Affect Pull Request Acceptance? An empirical study","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Davide Taibi, Nyyti Saarim\\\"aki, Valentina Lenarduzzi, Vili Nikkola","submitted_at":"2019-08-25T13:19:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Background. Pull requests are a common practice for contributing and reviewing contributions, and are employed both in open-source and industrial contexts. One of the main goals of code reviews is to find defects in the code, allowing project maintainers to easily integrate external contributions into a project and discuss the code contributions. Objective. The goal of this paper is to understand whether code quality is actually considered when pull requests are accepted. Specifically, we aim at understanding whether code quality issues such as code smells, antipatterns, and coding style viola"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1908.09321","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2019-08-25T13:19:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d6645f13b8eb19d55feab1a87d79585a46e789955aba3a773b2ac4607c8463da","abstract_canon_sha256":"b493bb6dae9d6988081fb5e9052496b66fa6ff05be32bde34efb779dcc454283"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142689Z","signature_b64":"8n3i7NSy4gt40/4jipxt5AyZuf8Nld30U7eqJMrIv2/Bm9uKG5YpTEts2oGLvBDCaqAfXq/4uwrAQ7G/epeYBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"69cd642ac7865e5f1d7d05cd4b2a6e137436ff52e3378b2b8a6f9456b38c7d94","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142360Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142360Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Does Code Quality Affect Pull Request Acceptance? An empirical study","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Davide Taibi, Nyyti Saarim\\\"aki, Valentina Lenarduzzi, Vili Nikkola","submitted_at":"2019-08-25T13:19:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Background. Pull requests are a common practice for contributing and reviewing contributions, and are employed both in open-source and industrial contexts. One of the main goals of code reviews is to find defects in the code, allowing project maintainers to easily integrate external contributions into a project and discuss the code contributions. Objective. The goal of this paper is to understand whether code quality is actually considered when pull requests are accepted. Specifically, we aim at understanding whether code quality issues such as code smells, antipatterns, and coding style viola"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1908.09321","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1908.09321/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1908.09321","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142412+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1908.09321v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142412+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1908.09321","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142412+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NHGWIKWHQZPF","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142412+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142412+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NHGWIKWH","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142412+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NHGWIKWH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NHGWIKWH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1908.09321&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NHGWIKWHQZPF6HL5AXGUWKTOCN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142412+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T23:59:39.142412+00:00"}