{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL","short_pith_number":"pith:NHKBPZIG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"69d417e5061c75df19d8257fc768854accb82529434c7d5615fa77dabdfafd0a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2202.06630","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Improved Finite-Key Security Analysis of Quantum Key Distribution Against Trojan-Horse Attacks","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"\\'Alvaro Navarrete, Marcos Curty","submitted_at":"2022-02-14T11:35:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Most security proofs of quantum key distribution (QKD) disregard the effect of information leakage from the users' devices, and, thus, do not protect against Trojan-horse attacks (THAs). In a THA, the eavesdropper injects strong light into the QKD apparatuses, and then analyzes the back-reflected light to learn information about their internal setting choices. Only a few recent works consider this security threat, but predict a rather poor performance of QKD unless the devices are strongly isolated from the channel. Here, we derive finite-key security bounds for decoy-state-based QKD schemes i"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2202.06630","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2022-02-14T11:35:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"798b6032b655d902b3ed11e7ba5a061cce1b00b9145c53cb981bdfe661f80922","abstract_canon_sha256":"c3dfcd4b4f6e0bb2d81516c8538bfb5ad12ef9ead9c017e2d93b2835677135a2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880662Z","signature_b64":"JOUKCNOLN69IwKHEx3e8A7/1JIfTvplaW2ceZls2Hzkqm/wdSiHCy/j3Rk8rrlPwLizxdXK5ryGJ8j66bTFqDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"69d417e5061c75df19d8257fc768854accb82529434c7d5615fa77dabdfafd0a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880087Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880087Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Improved Finite-Key Security Analysis of Quantum Key Distribution Against Trojan-Horse Attacks","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"\\'Alvaro Navarrete, Marcos Curty","submitted_at":"2022-02-14T11:35:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Most security proofs of quantum key distribution (QKD) disregard the effect of information leakage from the users' devices, and, thus, do not protect against Trojan-horse attacks (THAs). In a THA, the eavesdropper injects strong light into the QKD apparatuses, and then analyzes the back-reflected light to learn information about their internal setting choices. Only a few recent works consider this security threat, but predict a rather poor performance of QKD unless the devices are strongly isolated from the channel. Here, we derive finite-key security bounds for decoy-state-based QKD schemes i"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2202.06630","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2202.06630/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2202.06630","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880158+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2202.06630v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880158+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2202.06630","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880158+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NHKBPZIGDR25","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880158+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NHKBPZIGDR256GOY","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880158+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NHKBPZIG","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880158+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.10340","citing_title":"Security proofs for practical QKD: variations, techniques, gaps, and limitations","ref_index":77,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NHKBPZIG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NHKBPZIG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2202.06630&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NHKBPZIGDR256GOYEV74O2EFJL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880158+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:50.880158+00:00"}