{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA","short_pith_number":"pith:NMP6UOVP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6b1fea3aafe792ede25d603d6ab3cd0013a59c4c56aa703eeae357856f9f494c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2106.09022","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Simple Fix to Mahalanobis Distance for Improving Near-OOD Detection","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Abhijit Guha Roy, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Jeremiah Liu, Jie Ren, Shreyas Padhy, Stanislav Fort","submitted_at":"2021-06-16T20:43:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Mahalanobis distance (MD) is a simple and popular post-processing method for detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs in neural networks. We analyze its failure modes for near-OOD detection and propose a simple fix called relative Mahalanobis distance (RMD) which improves performance and is more robust to hyperparameter choice. On a wide selection of challenging vision, language, and biology OOD benchmarks (CIFAR-100 vs CIFAR-10, CLINC OOD intent detection, Genomics OOD), we show that RMD meaningfully improves upon MD performance (by up to 15% AUROC on genomics OOD)."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2106.09022","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2021-06-16T20:43:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"bfeb346cec09c42e14f245dbbc0b012d35effeb18881e8258cd6d5b851ed97ec","abstract_canon_sha256":"5f897cef8ef21550de2718ee3e2c10dfb2958d45d77c01cc406e5f36522827eb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921719Z","signature_b64":"aNQuyocH9cfxLRmz922oqxC1gYcVP8Ifxrade6XxXiik8RKXhKVd/87Aof3Jqbt71vqirQieFHB52qxEAGU/CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6b1fea3aafe792ede25d603d6ab3cd0013a59c4c56aa703eeae357856f9f494c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921271Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921271Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Simple Fix to Mahalanobis Distance for Improving Near-OOD Detection","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Abhijit Guha Roy, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Jeremiah Liu, Jie Ren, Shreyas Padhy, Stanislav Fort","submitted_at":"2021-06-16T20:43:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Mahalanobis distance (MD) is a simple and popular post-processing method for detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs in neural networks. We analyze its failure modes for near-OOD detection and propose a simple fix called relative Mahalanobis distance (RMD) which improves performance and is more robust to hyperparameter choice. On a wide selection of challenging vision, language, and biology OOD benchmarks (CIFAR-100 vs CIFAR-10, CLINC OOD intent detection, Genomics OOD), we show that RMD meaningfully improves upon MD performance (by up to 15% AUROC on genomics OOD)."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2106.09022","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2106.09022/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2106.09022","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2106.09022v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2106.09022","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NMP6UOVP46JO","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921336+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NMP6UOVP","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921336+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":16,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21386","citing_title":"VLA-FAIL: Efficient Task Failure Detection for Finetuned Vision-Language-Action Models","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.19603","citing_title":"Comparing Linear Probes with Mahalanobis Cosine Similarity","ref_index":101,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.17352","citing_title":"MM++: Unsupervised Scale-Invariant Multilayer OOD Detection via Top-K Gated Feature Fusion","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.09601","citing_title":"Assessing Sample Quality in Conditional Generation under Compositional Shift","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05536","citing_title":"Dual Feature Decoupling for Fine-Grained OOD Detection","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.31187","citing_title":"From Local Geometry to Global Pseudo Labeling for Robust Positive Unlabeled Learning under Covariate Shift","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27016","citing_title":"Evaluating the Relevance of Uncertainty Estimators for LLM Hallucination","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.17381","citing_title":"Beyond Binary Out-of-Distribution Detection: Characterizing Distributional Shifts with Multi-Statistic Diffusion Trajectories","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.19996","citing_title":"RankOOD -- Class Ranking-based Out-of-Distribution Detection","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.02618","citing_title":"Mind the Way You Select Negative Texts: Pursuing the Distance Consistency in OOD Detection with VLMs","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14413","citing_title":"MahaVar: OOD Detection via Class-wise Mahalanobis Distance Variance under Neural Collapse","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.04243","citing_title":"Temporal Reasoning Is Not the Bottleneck: A Probabilistic Inconsistency Framework for Neuro-Symbolic QA","ref_index":69,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11662","citing_title":"Hidden Failures in Robustness: Why Supervised Uncertainty Quantification Needs Better Evaluation","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2207.05221","citing_title":"Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know","ref_index":263,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15678","citing_title":"HyCal: A Training-Free Prototype Calibration Method for Cross-Discipline Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21546","citing_title":"Component-Based Out-of-Distribution Detection","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NMP6UOVP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NMP6UOVP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2106.09022&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NMP6UOVP46JO3YS5MA6WVM6NAA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921336+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:50:11.921336+00:00"}