{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL","short_pith_number":"pith:NO4XFO6I","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6bb972bbc8880a4329f04f23127bdb9ac6962c134bda7c68985cca69dd949c13","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.02025","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Logarithmic regret in the ergodic Avellaneda-Stoikov market making model","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.TR"],"primary_cat":"math.OC","authors_text":"David \\v{S}i\\v{s}ka, Jialun Cao, Lukasz Szpruch, Tanut Treetanthiploet","submitted_at":"2024-09-03T16:20:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"We analyse the regret arising from learning the price sensitivity parameter $\\kappa$ of liquidity takers in the ergodic version of the Avellaneda-Stoikov market making model. We show that a learning algorithm based on a maximum-likelihood estimator for the parameter achieves the regret upper bound of order $\\ln^2 T$ in expectation. To obtain the result we need two key ingredients. The first is the twice differentiability of the ergodic constant under the misspecified parameter in the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation with respect to $\\kappa$, which leads to a second--order performance gap"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.02025","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.OC","submitted_at":"2024-09-03T16:20:07Z","cross_cats_sorted":["q-fin.TR"],"title_canon_sha256":"b8e3da20f4f3f08f4dd73d08570f59766d90b82f8b9c496d9a168eb888018896","abstract_canon_sha256":"b52706db99dfec862d0a493d948a80669face09729f60edf9e98da658fae3cbc"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826594Z","signature_b64":"bmUtT2lSwvusz9aR7gTEvjeLWWFgahkQoTriqYUILE3t4Yk5bkbhOJGddq+KNT2j1QMajoCLOy2tBxc7EWVzBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6bb972bbc8880a4329f04f23127bdb9ac6962c134bda7c68985cca69dd949c13","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826028Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826028Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Logarithmic regret in the ergodic Avellaneda-Stoikov market making model","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.TR"],"primary_cat":"math.OC","authors_text":"David \\v{S}i\\v{s}ka, Jialun Cao, Lukasz Szpruch, Tanut Treetanthiploet","submitted_at":"2024-09-03T16:20:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"We analyse the regret arising from learning the price sensitivity parameter $\\kappa$ of liquidity takers in the ergodic version of the Avellaneda-Stoikov market making model. We show that a learning algorithm based on a maximum-likelihood estimator for the parameter achieves the regret upper bound of order $\\ln^2 T$ in expectation. To obtain the result we need two key ingredients. The first is the twice differentiability of the ergodic constant under the misspecified parameter in the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation with respect to $\\kappa$, which leads to a second--order performance gap"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.02025","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.02025/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.02025","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826097+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.02025v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826097+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.02025","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826097+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NO4XFO6IRAFE","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826097+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826097+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NO4XFO6I","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826097+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.24878","citing_title":"Entropy-Regularized Certainty-Equivalent Bellman Policies for Risk-Sensitive Market Making","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NO4XFO6I"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NO4XFO6I","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.02025&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NO4XFO6IRAFEGKPQJ4RRE663TL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826097+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:21.826097+00:00"}