{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G","short_pith_number":"pith:NOCKPCO4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6b84a789dcb2e7b38d2c1e22f8c246e99f939a385014ad0c43ff1eddf22434e6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2309.14735","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Legal Question-Answering in the Indian Context: Efficacy, Challenges, and Potential of Modern AI Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Arnab Bhattacharya, Ayush Kumar Mishra, Noel Shallum, Shubham Kumar Mishra, Shubham Kumar Nigam","submitted_at":"2023-09-26T07:56:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"Legal QA platforms bear the promise to metamorphose the manner in which legal experts engage with jurisprudential documents. In this exposition, we embark on a comparative exploration of contemporary AI frameworks, gauging their adeptness in catering to the unique demands of the Indian legal milieu, with a keen emphasis on Indian Legal Question Answering (AILQA). Our discourse zeroes in on an array of retrieval and QA mechanisms, positioning the OpenAI GPT model as a reference point. The findings underscore the proficiency of prevailing AILQA paradigms in decoding natural language prompts and "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2309.14735","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-09-26T07:56:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"ad93e28ee396b7560ddf0f78de743c6c4e12e92807fca8559d880f02aba80af6","abstract_canon_sha256":"b5b086daea419f331337dfcd78eb9013e469ff7df9da50b0d10007c5d836035d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.954273Z","signature_b64":"0eeYU0K1MSZbNkM1uRJDmTXsO4Tyr6GILfpnwzSDoFgzPP5Vx4iPhKrsiXlgNY5K44qINOXdpW90PjpjtXYMAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6b84a789dcb2e7b38d2c1e22f8c246e99f939a385014ad0c43ff1eddf22434e6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.953801Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.953801Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Legal Question-Answering in the Indian Context: Efficacy, Challenges, and Potential of Modern AI Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Arnab Bhattacharya, Ayush Kumar Mishra, Noel Shallum, Shubham Kumar Mishra, Shubham Kumar Nigam","submitted_at":"2023-09-26T07:56:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"Legal QA platforms bear the promise to metamorphose the manner in which legal experts engage with jurisprudential documents. In this exposition, we embark on a comparative exploration of contemporary AI frameworks, gauging their adeptness in catering to the unique demands of the Indian legal milieu, with a keen emphasis on Indian Legal Question Answering (AILQA). Our discourse zeroes in on an array of retrieval and QA mechanisms, positioning the OpenAI GPT model as a reference point. The findings underscore the proficiency of prevailing AILQA paradigms in decoding natural language prompts and "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2309.14735","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2309.14735/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2309.14735","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.953858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2309.14735v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.953858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2309.14735","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.953858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NOCKPCO4WLT3","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.953858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJM","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.953858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NOCKPCO4","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.953858+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.05836","citing_title":"LegalSeg: Unlocking the Structure of Indian Legal Judgments Through Rhetorical Role Classification","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NOCKPCO4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NOCKPCO4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2309.14735&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NOCKPCO4WLT3HDJMDYRPRQSG5G/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.953858+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:01:05.953858+00:00"}