{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB","short_pith_number":"pith:NOR6YTPH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6ba3ec4de7cbf39a547f79e88117fd2843d1acf89e39ba740ce0a06b86f035a3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2607.23174","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Do decisions about outliers and influential effects matter? Evidence from 358 behavioral science meta-analyses","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Martina Luskova, T. D. Stanley, Tomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova","submitted_at":"2026-07-25T12:09:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Meta-analysts routinely face estimates that look too large or extreme. Yet, how to handle them is left to the reviewer's judgment. The methods for detecting such estimates are well known. What is missing is an informed assessment of how much alternative handling choices might change a meta-analysis' conclusions. We fill this gap by analyzing the effects of four pre-registered handling treatments across 358 behavioral science meta-analyses with at least ten estimates. Each outlier handling treatment is estimated by two estimators (random effects and unrestricted weighted least squares), and com"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2607.23174","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"econ.EM","submitted_at":"2026-07-25T12:09:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e6ce85683fe7d182bb287c1bf1ee736bbd53c46fd3584952365d43bf2b7297ab","abstract_canon_sha256":"2eb48d4b0ae9f2beddcc1933f67522f3319dc141eb902e9703083fd4acd3e6df"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594976Z","signature_b64":"j6/fAPGYHVPGsz01xijWlI8yVSfHihMHqmZ/ZIPjM2J5lPnRytfY6iI4S0vuwexpSH2TpY4vkR0ohhp+RqJjCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6ba3ec4de7cbf39a547f79e88117fd2843d1acf89e39ba740ce0a06b86f035a3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594137Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594137Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Do decisions about outliers and influential effects matter? Evidence from 358 behavioral science meta-analyses","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Martina Luskova, T. D. Stanley, Tomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova","submitted_at":"2026-07-25T12:09:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Meta-analysts routinely face estimates that look too large or extreme. Yet, how to handle them is left to the reviewer's judgment. The methods for detecting such estimates are well known. What is missing is an informed assessment of how much alternative handling choices might change a meta-analysis' conclusions. We fill this gap by analyzing the effects of four pre-registered handling treatments across 358 behavioral science meta-analyses with at least ten estimates. Each outlier handling treatment is estimated by two estimators (random effects and unrestricted weighted least squares), and com"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2607.23174","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2607.23174/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2607.23174","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594578+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2607.23174v1","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594578+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2607.23174","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594578+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NOR6YTPHZPZZ","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594578+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594578+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NOR6YTPH","created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594578+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NOR6YTPH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NOR6YTPH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2607.23174&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NOR6YTPHZPZZUVD7PHUICF75FB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594578+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-28T01:22:10.594578+00:00"}