{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB","short_pith_number":"pith:NOZBMB3W","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6bb2160776a156bdfece2cd8c163537843eb48a5cf585de5c98eb2648cff76f8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2401.17169","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conditional and Modal Reasoning in Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Cedegao E. Zhang, Matthew Mandelkern, Wesley H. Holliday","submitted_at":"2024-01-30T16:56:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"The reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) are the topic of a growing body of research in AI and cognitive science. In this paper, we probe the extent to which twenty-nine LLMs are able to distinguish logically correct inferences from logically fallacious ones. We focus on inference patterns involving conditionals (e.g., 'If Ann has a queen, then Bob has a jack') and epistemic modals (e.g., 'Ann might have an ace', 'Bob must have a king'). These inferences have been of special interest to logicians, philosophers, and linguists, since they play a central role in the fundamental hum"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2401.17169","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-01-30T16:56:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LO"],"title_canon_sha256":"6e61702d7be24cee01f1a77a98051c414ce7ce149503853839d6273fd47a09e2","abstract_canon_sha256":"d961b8570f5013335cbb4b0e18938165a3459038e1e539f956ae2364ddc7729f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199707Z","signature_b64":"WDo8sOvGVZ2yM0pC/mjyIRQnhkaVVhlP2X0M8O/f6qVqK8omTcy2wajzfOAenoDszIuz0/1fITFb8fQLaSz6Bw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6bb2160776a156bdfece2cd8c163537843eb48a5cf585de5c98eb2648cff76f8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199210Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199210Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conditional and Modal Reasoning in Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Cedegao E. Zhang, Matthew Mandelkern, Wesley H. Holliday","submitted_at":"2024-01-30T16:56:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"The reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) are the topic of a growing body of research in AI and cognitive science. In this paper, we probe the extent to which twenty-nine LLMs are able to distinguish logically correct inferences from logically fallacious ones. We focus on inference patterns involving conditionals (e.g., 'If Ann has a queen, then Bob has a jack') and epistemic modals (e.g., 'Ann might have an ace', 'Bob must have a king'). These inferences have been of special interest to logicians, philosophers, and linguists, since they play a central role in the fundamental hum"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2401.17169","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2401.17169/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2401.17169","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199269+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2401.17169v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199269+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2401.17169","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199269+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NOZBMB3WUFLL","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199269+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NOZBMB3WUFLL37WO","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199269+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NOZBMB3W","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199269+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.16745","citing_title":"Beyond Memorization: Extending Reasoning Depth with Recurrence, Memory and Test-Time Compute Scaling","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NOZBMB3W"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NOZBMB3W","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2401.17169&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NOZBMB3WUFLL37WOFTMMCY2TPB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199269+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:19:26.199269+00:00"}