{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ","short_pith_number":"pith:NPO4QMK2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6bddc8315a50bd32b8a685bcf645c9567634c0d1be22d1c8233d17684d61a16f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.05243","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CLATTER: Comprehensive Entailment Reasoning for Hallucination Detection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Arie Cattan, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Eran Hirsch, Ido Dagan, Mohit Bansal, Ron Eliav, Shahaf Bassan","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T17:02:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"A common approach to hallucination detection casts it as a natural language inference (NLI) task, often using LLMs to classify whether the generated text is entailed by corresponding reference texts. Since entailment classification is a complex reasoning task, one would expect that LLMs could benefit from generating an explicit reasoning process, as in CoT reasoning or the explicit ``thinking'' of recent reasoning models. In this work, we propose that guiding such models to perform a systematic and comprehensive reasoning process -- one that both decomposes the text into smaller facts and also"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.05243","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T17:02:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ce90013dea5e853ca259592a0c5a1be14aee471b8518a85e261e6fcfdbea9c48","abstract_canon_sha256":"67fa74b2f80348fca252ff00f3f77fcbba2e4c9395ab258b880d551b82a15d14"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644644Z","signature_b64":"y20Tess9TI/30s1uSvyK35jtK6dNB4oveyAZ45IZtvR0mxwtuxSJxPXvpcjz6mE6dFhU3dlLOKm2BR9bbFd5Ag==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6bddc8315a50bd32b8a685bcf645c9567634c0d1be22d1c8233d17684d61a16f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644125Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644125Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CLATTER: Comprehensive Entailment Reasoning for Hallucination Detection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Arie Cattan, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Eran Hirsch, Ido Dagan, Mohit Bansal, Ron Eliav, Shahaf Bassan","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T17:02:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"A common approach to hallucination detection casts it as a natural language inference (NLI) task, often using LLMs to classify whether the generated text is entailed by corresponding reference texts. Since entailment classification is a complex reasoning task, one would expect that LLMs could benefit from generating an explicit reasoning process, as in CoT reasoning or the explicit ``thinking'' of recent reasoning models. In this work, we propose that guiding such models to perform a systematic and comprehensive reasoning process -- one that both decomposes the text into smaller facts and also"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.05243","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.05243/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.05243","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644191+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.05243v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644191+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.05243","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644191+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NPO4QMK2KC6T","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644191+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFG","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644191+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NPO4QMK2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644191+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03141","citing_title":"Beyond Precision: Importance-Aware Recall for Factuality Evaluation in Long-Form LLM Generation","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NPO4QMK2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NPO4QMK2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.05243&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NPO4QMK2KC6TFOFGQW6PMROJKZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644191+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:44.644191+00:00"}