{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF","short_pith_number":"pith:NQMA4TNF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6c180e4da59a85e3d246fbf14a7d33794eb3257d12df68ed56815cbdb446cfcf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1606.07526","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Parameterized Complexity Results for a Model of Theory of Mind Based on Dynamic Epistemic Logic","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Behaviour), Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, ILLC), Iris van de Pol (University of Amsterdam, Iris van Rooij (Radboud University Nijmegen, Jakub Szymanik (University of Amsterdam","submitted_at":"2016-06-24T00:32:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper we introduce a computational-level model of theory of mind (ToM) based on dynamic epistemic logic (DEL), and we analyze its computational complexity. The model is a special case of DEL model checking. We provide a parameterized complexity analysis, considering several aspects of DEL (e.g., number of agents, size of preconditions, etc.) as parameters. We show that model checking for DEL is PSPACE-hard, also when restricted to single-pointed models and S5 relations, thereby solving an open problem in the literature. Our approach is aimed at formalizing current intractability claims"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1606.07526","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LO","submitted_at":"2016-06-24T00:32:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"dd8e365a4a0741c95094dfec270c9035b442fd7d348ccc3158dc868649861519","abstract_canon_sha256":"e9ce86d63dc5befae4f7291b17963e0839cc188e8f1694db8421bbb09ba83f1e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:57.334258Z","signature_b64":"tVGafvOMdd/f4JaM8uaoIhbyYv10xuiaaRl6hjXkcp6bVNtNM8hwhC8BM0dm59yNcX79EghJ+Lmv8t8FsPnCDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6c180e4da59a85e3d246fbf14a7d33794eb3257d12df68ed56815cbdb446cfcf","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:57.333922Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:57.333922Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Parameterized Complexity Results for a Model of Theory of Mind Based on Dynamic Epistemic Logic","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Behaviour), Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, ILLC), Iris van de Pol (University of Amsterdam, Iris van Rooij (Radboud University Nijmegen, Jakub Szymanik (University of Amsterdam","submitted_at":"2016-06-24T00:32:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper we introduce a computational-level model of theory of mind (ToM) based on dynamic epistemic logic (DEL), and we analyze its computational complexity. The model is a special case of DEL model checking. We provide a parameterized complexity analysis, considering several aspects of DEL (e.g., number of agents, size of preconditions, etc.) as parameters. We show that model checking for DEL is PSPACE-hard, also when restricted to single-pointed models and S5 relations, thereby solving an open problem in the literature. Our approach is aimed at formalizing current intractability claims"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1606.07526","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1606.07526","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:57.333982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1606.07526v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:57.333982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1606.07526","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:57.333982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NQMA4TNFTKC6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:36.002864+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:36.002864+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NQMA4TNF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:36.002864+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NQMA4TNF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NQMA4TNF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1606.07526&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NQMA4TNFTKC6HUSG7PYUU7JTPF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:57.333982+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:11:57.333982+00:00"}