{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH","short_pith_number":"pith:NRSPIN3R","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6c64f43771808431ed4d2cf3c7311a49efc7c480d7afdec13b6042dbeb2db79f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1708.07126","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Dancing to ChaNGa: A Self-Consistent Prediction For Close SMBH Pair Formation Timescales Following Galaxy Mergers","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","authors_text":"Andrew Pontzen, Fabio Governato, Marta Volonteri, Michael Tremmel, Thomas R. Quinn","submitted_at":"2017-08-23T18:00:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present the first self-consistent prediction for the distribution of formation timescales for close Supermassive Black Hole (SMBH) pairs following galaxy mergers. Using ROMULUS25, the first large-scale cosmological simulation to accurately track the orbital evolution of SMBHs within their host galaxies down to sub-kpc scales, we predict an average formation rate density of close SMBH pairs of 0.013 cMpc^-3 Gyr^-1. We find that it is relatively rare for galaxy mergers to result in the formation of close SMBH pairs with sub-kpc separation and those that do form are often the result of Gyrs of"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1708.07126","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","submitted_at":"2017-08-23T18:00:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ab7205250a84b5a63985cd929e38ba2314e9630a055c13ee6a1b9782774e49ff","abstract_canon_sha256":"54cf29494fd8f6acae6839adab9ce759fee9962391a54cc4921b3c1be329dc0c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:16.602550Z","signature_b64":"1TDVLadMWjNXHyjuo0Pt+QzJqqyKL5bWWnWz93yufcYD+rt7ChiPThJNI2aQsq3NPmRZRtMARrtyUPxfH3VIDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6c64f43771808431ed4d2cf3c7311a49efc7c480d7afdec13b6042dbeb2db79f","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:16.601891Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:16.601891Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Dancing to ChaNGa: A Self-Consistent Prediction For Close SMBH Pair Formation Timescales Following Galaxy Mergers","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","authors_text":"Andrew Pontzen, Fabio Governato, Marta Volonteri, Michael Tremmel, Thomas R. Quinn","submitted_at":"2017-08-23T18:00:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present the first self-consistent prediction for the distribution of formation timescales for close Supermassive Black Hole (SMBH) pairs following galaxy mergers. Using ROMULUS25, the first large-scale cosmological simulation to accurately track the orbital evolution of SMBHs within their host galaxies down to sub-kpc scales, we predict an average formation rate density of close SMBH pairs of 0.013 cMpc^-3 Gyr^-1. We find that it is relatively rare for galaxy mergers to result in the formation of close SMBH pairs with sub-kpc separation and those that do form are often the result of Gyrs of"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1708.07126","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1708.07126","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:16.601997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1708.07126v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:16.601997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1708.07126","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:16.601997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NRSPIN3RQCCD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:34.259226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:34.259226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NRSPIN3R","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:34.259226+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2311.01300","citing_title":"Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NRSPIN3R"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NRSPIN3R","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1708.07126&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NRSPIN3RQCCDD3KNFTZ4OMI2JH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:16.601997+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:24:16.601997+00:00"}