{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR","short_pith_number":"pith:NS2R6VWY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6cb51f56d87012c537ad7079486d46944e675d4a043f1de67ea004249a6fe70b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.07208","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Uncertainty-guided annotation enhances segmentation with the human-in-the-loop","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Francesco Ciompi, Geert Litjens, Jeroen van der Laak, Joey Spronck, Nadieh Khalili","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T16:41:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"Deep learning algorithms, often critiqued for their 'black box' nature, traditionally fall short in providing the necessary transparency for trusted clinical use. This challenge is particularly evident when such models are deployed in local hospitals, encountering out-of-domain distributions due to varying imaging techniques and patient-specific pathologies. Yet, this limitation offers a unique avenue for continual learning. The Uncertainty-Guided Annotation (UGA) framework introduces a human-in-the-loop approach, enabling AI to convey its uncertainties to clinicians, effectively acting as an "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.07208","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T16:41:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"ce700ee4eb0cff5cae15f4b33ed89c522d92f381a05237dac82cb7cbaf73d260","abstract_canon_sha256":"6e90ec5e6a8a3f2bd6e9c0276c0746bad9ea2a9373291bf40df2b5e848925364"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412782Z","signature_b64":"3qgeh5b5y+RI48EnFGUcfvNxE7XuWPAdeAj548mAEoT1PuAOMCvXRbMIA+Bt4QoJcZvj2thu1wRHikoUenWfBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6cb51f56d87012c537ad7079486d46944e675d4a043f1de67ea004249a6fe70b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412313Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412313Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Uncertainty-guided annotation enhances segmentation with the human-in-the-loop","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Francesco Ciompi, Geert Litjens, Jeroen van der Laak, Joey Spronck, Nadieh Khalili","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T16:41:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"Deep learning algorithms, often critiqued for their 'black box' nature, traditionally fall short in providing the necessary transparency for trusted clinical use. This challenge is particularly evident when such models are deployed in local hospitals, encountering out-of-domain distributions due to varying imaging techniques and patient-specific pathologies. Yet, this limitation offers a unique avenue for continual learning. The Uncertainty-Guided Annotation (UGA) framework introduces a human-in-the-loop approach, enabling AI to convey its uncertainties to clinicians, effectively acting as an "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.07208","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.07208/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.07208","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412379+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.07208v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412379+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.07208","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412379+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NS2R6VWYOAJM","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412379+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5N","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412379+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NS2R6VWY","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412379+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18329","citing_title":"Lost in the Folds: When Cross-Validation Is Not a Deep Ensemble for Uncertainty Estimation","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NS2R6VWY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NS2R6VWY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.07208&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NS2R6VWYOAJMKN5NOB4UQ3KGSR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412379+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:49.412379+00:00"}