{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI","short_pith_number":"pith:NT4RU4OF","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.17329","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T08:35:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"2c76ca3b4726202570cd39aa9a78f755d24048aec4de865d5c0f165524da3e6c","abstract_canon_sha256":"f127db182c14c9a97b0a8fa80306d6b04b9fdc476ba2b72d60641502fccd939e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"6cf91a71c5bdb91642bf4cd1d59f812213d89ca78aec9ffaa91d0404c9faad48","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.17329","version":1},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.17329","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.17329v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.17329","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NT4RU4OFXW4R","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NT4RU4OF","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.17329","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T08:35:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"2c76ca3b4726202570cd39aa9a78f755d24048aec4de865d5c0f165524da3e6c","abstract_canon_sha256":"f127db182c14c9a97b0a8fa80306d6b04b9fdc476ba2b72d60641502fccd939e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"6cf91a71c5bdb91642bf4cd1d59f812213d89ca78aec9ffaa91d0404c9faad48","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52.410926Z","signature_b64":"PZ7fCooXhaY7o1106hAvEy14m12Da1wy+5mvi3xfR69t+Xu0913ax7iVNIwUGOr/uAbCfsq1ziOtGsmDlY6wDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6cf91a71c5bdb91642bf4cd1d59f812213d89ca78aec9ffaa91d0404c9faad48","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52.410263Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52.410263Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2605.17329","source_version":1,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"GQGYBdk+FDFWDv/X4/bR6SpzlFo5ILoafuqwsVLtlfhcTP3YSCaUogGBVMZPaprYsrl2R1A4sWBHo0D8qSiABg==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-29T19:34:25.728469Z"},"content_sha256":"9cd518ffe21bf4480f0489832076925f1a336374d063985c2280b3bef4029ce7","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:9cd518ffe21bf4480f0489832076925f1a336374d063985c2280b3bef4029ce7"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LPG: Balancing Efficiency and Policy Reasoning in Latent Policy Guardrails","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Latent Policy Guardrail compresses safety deliberation into 10 latent tokens to reach 84.5% accuracy at much lower latency.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Chaowei Xiao, Nanxi Li, Zhengyue Zhao","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T08:35:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Guardrails are a critical safety layer for modern AI systems, but their operating regime is changing. As LLMs are deployed as customized assistants, safety policies are increasingly specified at inference time by users, organizations, or regulatory contexts. This makes safety enforcement fundamentally dynamic: the guardrail should adapt to changing safety policies without retraining. Yet this requirement creates a fundamental tension: faithfully judging complex policy contexts demands reasoning capability, while practical deployment requires low-latency responses. We introduce Latent Policy Gu"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"LPG-4B reaches 84.5% average safety accuracy and 77.9% F1 by compressing deliberation into just 10 latent tokens, outperforming the strongest dynamic baseline while running roughly 11 times faster than Qwen3-4B-Thinking under the single-sample evaluation setup.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That continuous latent states supervised only by decision-relevant semantics can faithfully capture the intent interpretation and policy grounding required for complex, user-specified safety policies without explicit reasoning steps.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"LPG compresses policy deliberation into 10 latent tokens to reach 84.5% safety accuracy and 11x speedup over explicit reasoning baselines on guardrail benchmarks.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Latent Policy Guardrail compresses safety deliberation into 10 latent tokens to reach 84.5% accuracy at much lower latency.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"b489c7a970a5e7309061b3eb86c973954071a5ecaf48635efa15669ea2778d82"},"source":{"id":"2605.17329","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"c64516a7-cf7e-44a5-9788-af735b973be2","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T23:39:01.182484Z","strongest_claim":"LPG-4B reaches 84.5% average safety accuracy and 77.9% F1 by compressing deliberation into just 10 latent tokens, outperforming the strongest dynamic baseline while running roughly 11 times faster than Qwen3-4B-Thinking under the single-sample evaluation setup.","one_line_summary":"LPG compresses policy deliberation into 10 latent tokens to reach 84.5% safety accuracy and 11x speedup over explicit reasoning baselines on guardrail benchmarks.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That continuous latent states supervised only by decision-relevant semantics can faithfully capture the intent interpretation and policy grounding required for complex, user-specified safety policies without explicit reasoning steps.","pith_extraction_headline":"Latent Policy Guardrail compresses safety deliberation into 10 latent tokens to reach 84.5% accuracy at much lower latency."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.17329/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:20.647332Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T23:52:39.197914Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:41:57.810974Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:33:23.744490Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"387e266a2e53adce4eecc43da4d700a0e427c0d6781d127b132da061481c32bc"},"references":{"count":45,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2026,"title":"Latent reasoning with supervised thinking states","work_id":"165e76a2-4605-4f07-a195-637285b95ed3","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2022,"title":"Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback","work_id":"faaaa4e0-2676-4fac-a0b4-99aef10d2095","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"2212.08073","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"","year":2026,"title":"Emergent search and backtracking in latent reasoning models","work_id":"7bf38811-b0e9-4ea2-8c38-4810da5a53b6","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"Llama guard 3-1b-int4: Compact and efficient safeguard for human-ai conversations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17713, 2024","work_id":"cbc9c821-66e2-4ab8-ab02-fb863905a462","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2025,"title":"AEGIS2.0: A diverse ai safety dataset and risks taxonomy for alignment of llm guardrails","work_id":"d468418d-4f76-49bb-a0da-ebf21e257cbb","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":45,"snapshot_sha256":"140ab7d7532769c56684c466673caf75736e112c0dd5968b11b2dbb93098cd79","internal_anchors":12},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"4cf843ec4dca85cf2b504a42845740674f9951aade56ae089350324a03dc260e"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"c64516a7-cf7e-44a5-9788-af735b973be2"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"jxntcaIhrun4mxDc3d8rmvdSugdqknWHtvL2AJwdujRikmm8kgtavo+YS7C6IUkk3feR7NZYHAyRJ3sqL9lmDQ==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-29T19:34:25.729701Z"},"content_sha256":"244956b01bba494190ede4f5fbd97aeb7b4f7ccf1de15925112e7deb43dfb448","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:244956b01bba494190ede4f5fbd97aeb7b4f7ccf1de15925112e7deb43dfb448"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-05-29T19:34:25Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7JTI5LH4BEI","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"f127db182c14c9a97b0a8fa80306d6b04b9fdc476ba2b72d60641502fccd939e","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T08:35:38Z","title_canon_sha256":"2c76ca3b4726202570cd39aa9a78f755d24048aec4de865d5c0f165524da3e6c"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.17329","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.17329","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.17329v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.17329","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NT4RU4OFXW4R","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NT4RU4OFXW4RMQV7","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NT4RU4OF","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:244956b01bba494190ede4f5fbd97aeb7b4f7ccf1de15925112e7deb43dfb448","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"LPG-4B reaches 84.5% average safety accuracy and 77.9% F1 by compressing deliberation into just 10 latent tokens, outperforming the strongest dynamic baseline while running roughly 11 times faster than Qwen3-4B-Thinking under the single-sample evaluation setup."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That continuous latent states supervised only by decision-relevant semantics can faithfully capture the intent interpretation and policy grounding required for complex, user-specified safety policies without explicit reasoning steps."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"LPG compresses policy deliberation into 10 latent tokens to reach 84.5% safety accuracy and 11x speedup over explicit reasoning baselines on guardrail benchmarks."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Latent Policy Guardrail compresses safety deliberation into 10 latent tokens to reach 84.5% accuracy at much lower latency."}],"snapshot_sha256":"b489c7a970a5e7309061b3eb86c973954071a5ecaf48635efa15669ea2778d82"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"4cf843ec4dca85cf2b504a42845740674f9951aade56ae089350324a03dc260e"},"integrity":{"available":true,"clean":true,"detectors_run":[{"findings_count":0,"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:20.647332Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T23:52:39.197914Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:41:57.810974Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0"},{"findings_count":0,"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:33:23.744490Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0"}],"endpoint":"/pith/2605.17329/integrity.json","findings":[],"snapshot_sha256":"387e266a2e53adce4eecc43da4d700a0e427c0d6781d127b132da061481c32bc","summary":{"advisory":0,"by_detector":{},"critical":0,"informational":0}},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Guardrails are a critical safety layer for modern AI systems, but their operating regime is changing. As LLMs are deployed as customized assistants, safety policies are increasingly specified at inference time by users, organizations, or regulatory contexts. This makes safety enforcement fundamentally dynamic: the guardrail should adapt to changing safety policies without retraining. Yet this requirement creates a fundamental tension: faithfully judging complex policy contexts demands reasoning capability, while practical deployment requires low-latency responses. We introduce Latent Policy Gu","authors_text":"Chaowei Xiao, Nanxi Li, Zhengyue Zhao","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"headline":"Latent Policy Guardrail compresses safety deliberation into 10 latent tokens to reach 84.5% accuracy at much lower latency.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T08:35:38Z","title":"LPG: Balancing Efficiency and Policy Reasoning in Latent Policy Guardrails"},"references":{"count":45,"internal_anchors":12,"resolved_work":45,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"Latent reasoning with supervised thinking states","work_id":"165e76a2-4605-4f07-a195-637285b95ed3","year":2026},{"cited_arxiv_id":"2212.08073","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":true,"ref_index":2,"title":"Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback","work_id":"faaaa4e0-2676-4fac-a0b4-99aef10d2095","year":2022},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Emergent search and backtracking in latent reasoning models","work_id":"7bf38811-b0e9-4ea2-8c38-4810da5a53b6","year":2026},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"Llama guard 3-1b-int4: Compact and efficient safeguard for human-ai conversations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17713, 2024","work_id":"cbc9c821-66e2-4ab8-ab02-fb863905a462","year":2024},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"AEGIS2.0: A diverse ai safety dataset and risks taxonomy for alignment of llm guardrails","work_id":"d468418d-4f76-49bb-a0da-ebf21e257cbb","year":2025}],"snapshot_sha256":"140ab7d7532769c56684c466673caf75736e112c0dd5968b11b2dbb93098cd79"},"source":{"id":"2605.17329","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-19T23:39:01.182484Z","id":"c64516a7-cf7e-44a5-9788-af735b973be2","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"LPG compresses policy deliberation into 10 latent tokens to reach 84.5% safety accuracy and 11x speedup over explicit reasoning baselines on guardrail benchmarks.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Latent Policy Guardrail compresses safety deliberation into 10 latent tokens to reach 84.5% accuracy at much lower latency.","strongest_claim":"LPG-4B reaches 84.5% average safety accuracy and 77.9% F1 by compressing deliberation into just 10 latent tokens, outperforming the strongest dynamic baseline while running roughly 11 times faster than Qwen3-4B-Thinking under the single-sample evaluation setup.","weakest_assumption":"That continuous latent states supervised only by decision-relevant semantics can faithfully capture the intent interpretation and policy grounding required for complex, user-specified safety policies without explicit reasoning steps."}},"verdict_id":"c64516a7-cf7e-44a5-9788-af735b973be2"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:9cd518ffe21bf4480f0489832076925f1a336374d063985c2280b3bef4029ce7","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"f127db182c14c9a97b0a8fa80306d6b04b9fdc476ba2b72d60641502fccd939e","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T08:35:38Z","title_canon_sha256":"2c76ca3b4726202570cd39aa9a78f755d24048aec4de865d5c0f165524da3e6c"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.17329","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"6cf91a71c5bdb91642bf4cd1d59f812213d89ca78aec9ffaa91d0404c9faad48","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"6cf91a71c5bdb91642bf4cd1d59f812213d89ca78aec9ffaa91d0404c9faad48","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52.410263Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52.410263Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"PZ7fCooXhaY7o1106hAvEy14m12Da1wy+5mvi3xfR69t+Xu0913ax7iVNIwUGOr/uAbCfsq1ziOtGsmDlY6wDw==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:52.410926Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.17329","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:9cd518ffe21bf4480f0489832076925f1a336374d063985c2280b3bef4029ce7","sha256:244956b01bba494190ede4f5fbd97aeb7b4f7ccf1de15925112e7deb43dfb448"],"state_sha256":"c5ab6ce4d8b9fca880455ec69f5a68c131d1d65c04b3be24a3f40c8ea92ba25f"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"i3WchKW/KYHqusj6iaV2RbtQS0Th6RpklCI6Oblwaz37lHYkLrARG/ozl1pvGk1fbRghOp9bd0Wd6RcPgnNABA==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-29T19:34:25.734665Z","bundle_sha256":"6b4169d0f060c91128310b05640afa8e30dd626c28fe64be388a34f5a5a7062a"}}