{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS","short_pith_number":"pith:NT56MK4A","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6cfbe62b809523a298f7f0cfe2b2c254a3d028d2fdee283cacd17e1be0f2328d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1806.07289","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Naturalness, Extra-Empirical Theory Assessments, and the Implications of Skepticism","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"James D. Wells","submitted_at":"2018-06-19T14:43:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Naturalness is an extra-empirical quality that aims to assess plausibility of a theory. Finetuning measures are often deputized to quantify the task. However, knowing statistical distributions on parameters appears necessary. Such meta-theories are not known yet. A critical discussion of these issues is presented, including their possible resolutions in fixed points. Both agreement to and skepticism of naturalness's utility remains credible, as is skepticism to any extra-empirical theory assessment (SEETA) that claims to identify \"more correct\" theories that are equally empirically adequate. T"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1806.07289","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","submitted_at":"2018-06-19T14:43:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ph","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"2de96cb5c485a160d5460121c0c97aaae4c9e6490db08114d54fc175501a3b93","abstract_canon_sha256":"b6635602bb85ccba5fd5a2724301faaf0b179837bce5f93e2dc2f527f24bc160"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:00:54.958975Z","signature_b64":"ACL0OjTD7AkmZQyM0QYxj+LXxhh9xuGgBfQw5SZwvdJqfe4oUR2cvVWfxmjJDX5IdBMSaKIqDqEoEdzvdCEtDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6cfbe62b809523a298f7f0cfe2b2c254a3d028d2fdee283cacd17e1be0f2328d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:00:54.958346Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:00:54.958346Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Naturalness, Extra-Empirical Theory Assessments, and the Implications of Skepticism","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"James D. Wells","submitted_at":"2018-06-19T14:43:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Naturalness is an extra-empirical quality that aims to assess plausibility of a theory. Finetuning measures are often deputized to quantify the task. However, knowing statistical distributions on parameters appears necessary. Such meta-theories are not known yet. A critical discussion of these issues is presented, including their possible resolutions in fixed points. Both agreement to and skepticism of naturalness's utility remains credible, as is skepticism to any extra-empirical theory assessment (SEETA) that claims to identify \"more correct\" theories that are equally empirically adequate. T"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1806.07289","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1806.07289","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:00:54.958435+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1806.07289v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:00:54.958435+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1806.07289","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:00:54.958435+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NT56MK4ASUR2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:40.477152+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:40.477152+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NT56MK4A","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:40.477152+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2008.10625","citing_title":"Lectures on Naturalness, String Landscape and Multiverse","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NT56MK4A"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NT56MK4A","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1806.07289&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NT56MK4ASUR2FGHX6DH6FMWCKS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:00:54.958435+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:00:54.958435+00:00"}