{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I","short_pith_number":"pith:NTJMRHMP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6cd2c89d8f12d99e268d61a5028ffbda22dda099648305d247781a351c7a2c8e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.12510","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Aspect-Guided Multi-Level Perturbation Analysis of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jiatao Li, Mingqi Gao, Xiaojun Wan, Xinyu Hu, Yanheng Li","submitted_at":"2025-02-18T03:50:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"We propose an aspect-guided, multi-level perturbation framework to evaluate the robustness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in automated peer review. Our framework explores perturbations in three key components of the peer review process-papers, reviews, and rebuttals-across several quality aspects, including contribution, soundness, presentation, tone, and completeness. By applying targeted perturbations and examining their effects on both LLM-as-Reviewer and LLM-as-Meta-Reviewer, we investigate how aspect-based manipulations, such as omitting methodological details from papers or altering rev"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.12510","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-02-18T03:50:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"711054b5c24f80dbf00eaf711753448aa1395018386b806d3a2ffca37cd57fc5","abstract_canon_sha256":"d0f4588e23836d1047b42bf87fdde0b72916093dd1b47d8a087eea4d1d064abc"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729798Z","signature_b64":"RHusJunPrc4PGyJrTnrwtR59SbSlKkwP5MtCchl2VMi3Vr5Rpreh5QirqtGXSJGTXTgvVkAJ7b8Nf3gSE/45Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6cd2c89d8f12d99e268d61a5028ffbda22dda099648305d247781a351c7a2c8e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729301Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729301Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Aspect-Guided Multi-Level Perturbation Analysis of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jiatao Li, Mingqi Gao, Xiaojun Wan, Xinyu Hu, Yanheng Li","submitted_at":"2025-02-18T03:50:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"We propose an aspect-guided, multi-level perturbation framework to evaluate the robustness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in automated peer review. Our framework explores perturbations in three key components of the peer review process-papers, reviews, and rebuttals-across several quality aspects, including contribution, soundness, presentation, tone, and completeness. By applying targeted perturbations and examining their effects on both LLM-as-Reviewer and LLM-as-Meta-Reviewer, we investigate how aspect-based manipulations, such as omitting methodological details from papers or altering rev"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.12510","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.12510/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.12510","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729366+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.12510v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729366+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.12510","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729366+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NTJMRHMPCLMZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729366+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUN","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729366+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NTJMRHMP","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729366+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.13349","citing_title":"From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NTJMRHMP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NTJMRHMP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.12510&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NTJMRHMPCLMZ4JUNMGSQFD733I/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729366+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:15:56.729366+00:00"}