{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5","short_pith_number":"pith:NTSMDIDQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6ce4c1a070e1ea8791f9f48c591a469f6fa3df90b992c385bf854f3b64c94be4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2309.08047","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bias in News Summarization: Measures, Pitfalls and Corpora","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Julius Steen, Katja Markert","submitted_at":"2023-09-14T22:20:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Summarization is an important application of large language models (LLMs). Most previous evaluation of summarization models has focused on their content selection, faithfulness, grammaticality and coherence. However, it is well known that LLMs can reproduce and reinforce harmful social biases. This raises the question: Do biases affect model outputs in a constrained setting like summarization? To help answer this question, we first motivate and introduce a number of definitions for biased behaviours in summarization models, along with practical operationalizations. Since we find that biases in"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2309.08047","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-09-14T22:20:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"66d0bcffd084771663fbdea92aabbd680c533db1fd477dd30444a4b2dfa4e145","abstract_canon_sha256":"9f3058c1c41629460962e3699b58e1108a46707fbb10a35eb47c907a83d2a6ee"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188556Z","signature_b64":"/wyoCgGE44xII80iYEJ1fLrTEBnManVKwhRtwDa61/Wf9bX1ouvkOfpVc0I8GIwRwlIXBKEXL4NjQ7oziFX8Cg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6ce4c1a070e1ea8791f9f48c591a469f6fa3df90b992c385bf854f3b64c94be4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188055Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188055Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bias in News Summarization: Measures, Pitfalls and Corpora","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Julius Steen, Katja Markert","submitted_at":"2023-09-14T22:20:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Summarization is an important application of large language models (LLMs). Most previous evaluation of summarization models has focused on their content selection, faithfulness, grammaticality and coherence. However, it is well known that LLMs can reproduce and reinforce harmful social biases. This raises the question: Do biases affect model outputs in a constrained setting like summarization? To help answer this question, we first motivate and introduce a number of definitions for biased behaviours in summarization models, along with practical operationalizations. Since we find that biases in"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2309.08047","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2309.08047/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2309.08047","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188115+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2309.08047v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188115+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2309.08047","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188115+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NTSMDIDQ4HVI","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188115+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188115+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NTSMDIDQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188115+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21309","citing_title":"When Bigger Isn't Better: A Comprehensive Fairness Evaluation of Political Bias in Multi-News Summarisation","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NTSMDIDQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NTSMDIDQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2309.08047&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NTSMDIDQ4HVIPEPZ6SGFSGSGT5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188115+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:28:02.188115+00:00"}