{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ","short_pith_number":"pith:NTTELURP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6ce645d22fab50c3e83d8049d68a5a140ffa8c19f1c6ac40d2eb191cb9709f2c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2606.09024","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Personal Salience: Highlighting Is Social, but Individuality Lives in Selection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.HC","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Kazuki Nakayashiki, Keisuke Watanabe","submitted_at":"2026-06-08T04:44:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Social highlighters let people mark passages that matter to them. We ask how much of an individual is recoverable from these naturalistic traces, using a co-readership identity control (the same document highlighted by many users) that holds document and topic fixed and asks whether a person's own history predicts their marks better than another reader's does. We separate generic salience (structure), crowd salience (what others marked), and personal salience (the individual residual). First, highlighting is social: which sentences you mark is predicted far better by the crowd than by structur"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2606.09024","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2026-06-08T04:44:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.HC","cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"0d0b59a5ddca7f4edaaa73c88b0ccb74096404178a45cf49f673808a61c8a8e6","abstract_canon_sha256":"407160070d695d048e105d68c62c705352baa1c2812af146bbb8c99d6002d2ae"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089845Z","signature_b64":"crCDJ+Bslfy8gV58iCGjrOr9QRSyQS+SqG3YSwAwIu7C8q2sTaPozmrIaY4eJNvKVYfhCZdeK4Jka1lFtgJ6AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6ce645d22fab50c3e83d8049d68a5a140ffa8c19f1c6ac40d2eb191cb9709f2c","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089018Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089018Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Personal Salience: Highlighting Is Social, but Individuality Lives in Selection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.HC","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Kazuki Nakayashiki, Keisuke Watanabe","submitted_at":"2026-06-08T04:44:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Social highlighters let people mark passages that matter to them. We ask how much of an individual is recoverable from these naturalistic traces, using a co-readership identity control (the same document highlighted by many users) that holds document and topic fixed and asks whether a person's own history predicts their marks better than another reader's does. We separate generic salience (structure), crowd salience (what others marked), and personal salience (the individual residual). First, highlighting is social: which sentences you mark is predicted far better by the crowd than by structur"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2606.09024","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2606.09024/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2606.09024","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089167+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2606.09024v1","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089167+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2606.09024","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089167+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NTTELURPVNIM","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089167+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NTTELURPVNIMH2B5","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089167+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NTTELURP","created_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089167+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.10398","citing_title":"Selection, Not Salience: The Shape and Limits of Personalization in Social Highlighting","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NTTELURP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NTTELURP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2606.09024&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NTTELURPVNIMH2B5QBE5NCS2CQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089167+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-09T02:07:54.089167+00:00"}