{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H","short_pith_number":"pith:NUH5RVGL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6d0fd8d4cba2ffb3be6419d3cabc6ff1e6568edc23ad50218aa3e216405692ff","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.20064","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The LLMbda Calculus: AI Agents, Conversations, and Information Flow","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.PL","authors_text":"Andrew D. Gordon, David Sands, Zac Garby","submitted_at":"2026-02-23T17:22:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models are increasingly deployed as agents: they plan, call tools, read untrusted data, and act on the results. This exposes them to prompt injection: data meant only to be read is obeyed as an instruction. The most principled defences replace content inspection with provenance: classifying data by source and keeping trusted and untrusted apart through a separation of duty (the dual-LLM pattern) and information-flow control. Yet the leading systems are hard to fully trust: flow tracking is easy to get wrong, deliberate relaxations are hard to audit, and the dual-LLM pattern is h"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.20064","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.PL","submitted_at":"2026-02-23T17:22:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CR"],"title_canon_sha256":"462514d4147776ffeb0f6fc380b15b8f0620e57707f8d738f0f2539231619fb4","abstract_canon_sha256":"3e4841f1744f3fa190d1f0084cec7e0ac8d5029bbb681e3b7deebe4d50494578"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.758286Z","signature_b64":"lgV0R3kIjFJUkjdUcZip2FfLcZvSpdNIWc0jkrULWATXwnxiNzTi8H2kfmrO7RoI+UriAnYPrK+Hrdd0t24UAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6d0fd8d4cba2ffb3be6419d3cabc6ff1e6568edc23ad50218aa3e216405692ff","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.756977Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.756977Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The LLMbda Calculus: AI Agents, Conversations, and Information Flow","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.PL","authors_text":"Andrew D. Gordon, David Sands, Zac Garby","submitted_at":"2026-02-23T17:22:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models are increasingly deployed as agents: they plan, call tools, read untrusted data, and act on the results. This exposes them to prompt injection: data meant only to be read is obeyed as an instruction. The most principled defences replace content inspection with provenance: classifying data by source and keeping trusted and untrusted apart through a separation of duty (the dual-LLM pattern) and information-flow control. Yet the leading systems are hard to fully trust: flow tracking is easy to get wrong, deliberate relaxations are hard to audit, and the dual-LLM pattern is h"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2602.20064","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.20064/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.20064","created_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.757575+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.20064v2","created_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.757575+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.20064","created_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.757575+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NUH5RVGLUL73","created_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.757575+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NUH5RVGLUL73HPTE","created_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.757575+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NUH5RVGL","created_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.757575+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":6,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.26542","citing_title":"ChainCaps: Composition-Safe Tool-Using Agents via Monotonic Capability Attenuation","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.26542","citing_title":"ChainCaps: Composition-Safe Tool-Using Agents via Monotonic Capability Attenuation","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.26542","citing_title":"ChainCaps: Composition-Safe Tool-Using Agents via Monotonic Capability Attenuation","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.26542","citing_title":"ChainCaps: Composition-Safe Tool-Using Agents via Monotonic Capability Attenuation","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.29082","citing_title":"The Importance of Out-of-Band Metadata for Safe Autonomous Agents: The Redpanda Agentic Data Plane","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05440","citing_title":"Authorization Propagation in Multi-Agent AI Systems: Identity Governance as Infrastructure","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NUH5RVGL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NUH5RVGL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.20064&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NUH5RVGLUL73HPTEDHJ4VPDP6H/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.757575+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-13T01:20:06.757575+00:00"}