{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6","short_pith_number":"pith:NUTTTFJL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6d2739952b75d822b72a19e47013540fad74f8812f9bb309818bbf7b09dfab20","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2002.05867","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Transformers as Soft Reasoners over Language","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Kyle Richardson, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark","submitted_at":"2020-02-14T04:23:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Beginning with McCarthy's Advice Taker (1959), AI has pursued the goal of providing a system with explicit, general knowledge and having the system reason over that knowledge. However, expressing the knowledge in a formal (logical or probabilistic) representation has been a major obstacle to this research. This paper investigates a modern approach to this problem where the facts and rules are provided as natural language sentences, thus bypassing a formal representation. We train transformers to reason (or emulate reasoning) over these sentences using synthetically generated data. Our models, "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2002.05867","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2020-02-14T04:23:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"96cb9ab09855554463cc91e05db3b26baa39e4e1ba5adbe59329aadd43775831","abstract_canon_sha256":"0b0e7d6b36c9d49bbbf1ea6635c1308d1095798b745bc1dfefc0441957f35906"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289628Z","signature_b64":"6Hh9OT/wMMsl71uDTSEZ6IhIyOraoHqEfTnw3EqyzlTrbV9dbvd3XXnAIZs2VDjR5arWsEIt8dp4ge4Zd4d9Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6d2739952b75d822b72a19e47013540fad74f8812f9bb309818bbf7b09dfab20","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289098Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289098Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Transformers as Soft Reasoners over Language","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Kyle Richardson, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark","submitted_at":"2020-02-14T04:23:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Beginning with McCarthy's Advice Taker (1959), AI has pursued the goal of providing a system with explicit, general knowledge and having the system reason over that knowledge. However, expressing the knowledge in a formal (logical or probabilistic) representation has been a major obstacle to this research. This paper investigates a modern approach to this problem where the facts and rules are provided as natural language sentences, thus bypassing a formal representation. We train transformers to reason (or emulate reasoning) over these sentences using synthetically generated data. Our models, "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2002.05867","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2002.05867/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2002.05867","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289152+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2002.05867v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289152+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2002.05867","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289152+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NUTTTFJLOXMC","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289152+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZK","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289152+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NUTTTFJL","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289152+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.20227","citing_title":"QMFOL: Benchmarking Large Language Model Reasoning via Quantifiable Monadic First-Order Logic Test Case Generation","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11445","citing_title":"Forecasting Future Behavior as a Learning Task","ref_index":165,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.15707","citing_title":"Is Large Language Model Performance on Reasoning Tasks Impacted by Different Ways Questions Are Asked?","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.02627","citing_title":"DecompSR: A dataset for decomposed analyses of compositional multihop spatial reasoning","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05741","citing_title":"HyperLens: Quantifying Cognitive Effort in LLMs with Fine-grained Confidence Trajectory","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NUTTTFJL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NUTTTFJL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2002.05867&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NUTTTFJLOXMCFNZKDHSHAE2UB6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289152+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:16.289152+00:00"}