{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7","short_pith_number":"pith:NVMCE3WR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6d58226ed1bb747bc41cdca586695f0fcbb04a4c09a68d572c89daffefec0f86","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2607.02820","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Git Hash Chain Malleability","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Jacob Ginesin","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T23:19:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Git commit signing is widely entrusted to serve as evidence that a commit hash uniquely and immutably identifies a specific piece of signed content. We show this invariant does not hold. Given any signed commit, an attacker without access to the signing key, and without breaking SHA2 can produce a second, distinct commit with an identical tree, identical metadata, a valid signature, and a ``Verified'' badge from a Git Forge such as Github, differing only in its commit hash. The modified commit cascades to modify the values of all the subsequent, dependent commit hashes, hence we introduce the "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2607.02820","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T23:19:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"291f390acd74a2b9506e2d76101f2a86317b721805773a2d1c1bcec8f5ab33ae","abstract_canon_sha256":"7dc43e78ab08400f5a703911aa81da2abd9700a1fc9e0f8ab22880bf60fa00a3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.041243Z","signature_b64":"LbmWRnc0P7up12nYa1i1D3IO5qqvy/BwSBkxgwbDMEsuq4682tH99TiSVUOyZE96fD3JHIDCvqpbIvhm8wnqCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6d58226ed1bb747bc41cdca586695f0fcbb04a4c09a68d572c89daffefec0f86","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.040637Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.040637Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Git Hash Chain Malleability","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Jacob Ginesin","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T23:19:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Git commit signing is widely entrusted to serve as evidence that a commit hash uniquely and immutably identifies a specific piece of signed content. We show this invariant does not hold. Given any signed commit, an attacker without access to the signing key, and without breaking SHA2 can produce a second, distinct commit with an identical tree, identical metadata, a valid signature, and a ``Verified'' badge from a Git Forge such as Github, differing only in its commit hash. The modified commit cascades to modify the values of all the subsequent, dependent commit hashes, hence we introduce the "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2607.02820","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2607.02820/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2607.02820","created_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.040710+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2607.02820v1","created_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.040710+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2607.02820","created_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.040710+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NVMCE3WRXN2H","created_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.040710+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA4","created_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.040710+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NVMCE3WR","created_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.040710+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.06508","citing_title":"Canonicalization Failures as a Recurring Vulnerability Class: Representation Divergence in Cryptographic Systems and Its Avoidance","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NVMCE3WR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NVMCE3WR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2607.02820&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NVMCE3WRXN2HXRA43SSYM2K7B7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.040710+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-07T00:16:19.040710+00:00"}