{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU","short_pith_number":"pith:NVX6IB6Z","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"6d6fe407d9eaa4a497bd566d1d414f4d0a2366eada046b79dc4c4fd67b8c7288","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2509.09125","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Automated Classification of Tutors' Dialogue Acts Using Generative AI: A Case Study Using the CIMA Corpus","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jiaqi Xu, Liqun He","submitted_at":"2025-09-11T03:36:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study explores the use of generative AI for automating the classification of tutors' Dialogue Acts (DAs), aiming to reduce the time and effort required by traditional manual coding. This case study uses the open-source CIMA corpus, in which tutors' responses are pre-annotated into four DA categories. Both GPT-3.5-turbo and GPT-4 models were tested using tailored prompts. Results show that GPT-4 achieved 80% accuracy, a weighted F1-score of 0.81, and a Cohen's Kappa of 0.74, surpassing baseline performance and indicating substantial agreement with human annotations. These findings suggest "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2509.09125","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-09-11T03:36:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"a931d665040e2934e8d16c0b5e512313b7f1877030e8d93815a8577cf05dc255","abstract_canon_sha256":"d37fb43181021dd458c7ae34de5081e05ddd5b7fc967f267e8c5ff4936d108a1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946556Z","signature_b64":"JcQ7afXt5h3EE+exYcZuYMh8jO9c3/gBiadERZNRYGZMC3xutMo1r0sKTuu1HZSdTEe/j5PP4DlI91wAZX8oCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"6d6fe407d9eaa4a497bd566d1d414f4d0a2366eada046b79dc4c4fd67b8c7288","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946017Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946017Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Automated Classification of Tutors' Dialogue Acts Using Generative AI: A Case Study Using the CIMA Corpus","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jiaqi Xu, Liqun He","submitted_at":"2025-09-11T03:36:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study explores the use of generative AI for automating the classification of tutors' Dialogue Acts (DAs), aiming to reduce the time and effort required by traditional manual coding. This case study uses the open-source CIMA corpus, in which tutors' responses are pre-annotated into four DA categories. Both GPT-3.5-turbo and GPT-4 models were tested using tailored prompts. Results show that GPT-4 achieved 80% accuracy, a weighted F1-score of 0.81, and a Cohen's Kappa of 0.74, surpassing baseline performance and indicating substantial agreement with human annotations. These findings suggest "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2509.09125","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2509.09125/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2509.09125","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946076+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2509.09125v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946076+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.09125","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946076+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"NVX6IB6Z5KSK","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946076+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946076+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"NVX6IB6Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946076+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.04370","citing_title":"Decoding Student Dialogue: A Multi-Dimensional Comparison and Bias Analysis of Large Language Models as Annotation Tools","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NVX6IB6Z"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/NVX6IB6Z","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2509.09125&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/NVX6IB6Z5KSKJF55KZWR2QKPJU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946076+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:09:29.946076+00:00"}