{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2010:O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2","short_pith_number":"pith:O2GYWKNX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"768d8b29b7c2d967fb13d640315ac346a66ad7fd457e3dd42bb6e2a9c23c979f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1007.4580","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Cases for the nugget in modeling computer experiments","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.CO","authors_text":"Herbert K.H. Lee, Robert B. Gramacy","submitted_at":"2010-07-26T22:07:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Most surrogate models for computer experiments are interpolators, and the most common interpolator is a Gaussian process (GP) that deliberately omits a small-scale (measurement) error term called the nugget. The explanation is that computer experiments are, by definition, \"deterministic\", and so there is no measurement error. We think this is too narrow a focus for a computer experiment and a statistically inefficient way to model them. We show that estimating a (non-zero) nugget can lead to surrogate models with better statistical properties, such as predictive accuracy and coverage, in a var"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1007.4580","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.CO","submitted_at":"2010-07-26T22:07:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"07ada9ec4091966326eded32b75fd063a6cb75c6b3e9e6ec2b5c19bf54df0138","abstract_canon_sha256":"58d9989f541188426796f67a7b2e01200777e5149eb5f42f6103ac4dcb421461"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:04.734285Z","signature_b64":"UX9P30NVgjJiOa0MeILVfENu7kjKUF21XpptQjoUPDZpSwVe5x+x0Niny+8c8F8yKLMlUsjM3t7+x5VI6JGlCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"768d8b29b7c2d967fb13d640315ac346a66ad7fd457e3dd42bb6e2a9c23c979f","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:04.733856Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:04.733856Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Cases for the nugget in modeling computer experiments","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.CO","authors_text":"Herbert K.H. Lee, Robert B. Gramacy","submitted_at":"2010-07-26T22:07:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Most surrogate models for computer experiments are interpolators, and the most common interpolator is a Gaussian process (GP) that deliberately omits a small-scale (measurement) error term called the nugget. The explanation is that computer experiments are, by definition, \"deterministic\", and so there is no measurement error. We think this is too narrow a focus for a computer experiment and a statistically inefficient way to model them. We show that estimating a (non-zero) nugget can lead to surrogate models with better statistical properties, such as predictive accuracy and coverage, in a var"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1007.4580","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1007.4580","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:04.733914+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1007.4580v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:04.733914+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1007.4580","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:04.733914+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"O2GYWKNXYLMW","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:12.377268+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:12.377268+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"O2GYWKNX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:12.377268+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16600","citing_title":"A data-driven prediction for the primordial deuterium abundance","ref_index":68,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/O2GYWKNX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/O2GYWKNX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1007.4580&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/O2GYWKNXYLMWP6YT2ZADCWWDI2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:04.733914+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:04.733914+00:00"}