{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU","short_pith_number":"pith:O37L2Q4K","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"76febd438a60e9c951ef1c2e1d02d20d2c01e6f9e9799ce62f41eeeecc854f31","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2011.12843","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Aaron Clauset, Amir Ghasemian, David M. Rothschild, Duncan J. Watts, Homa Hosseinmardi, Markus Mobius","submitted_at":"2020-11-25T16:00:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Although it is under-studied relative to other social media platforms, YouTube is arguably the largest and most engaging online media consumption platform in the world. Recently, YouTube's scale has fueled concerns that YouTube users are being radicalized via a combination of biased recommendations and ostensibly apolitical anti-woke channels, both of which have been claimed to direct attention to radical political content. Here we test this hypothesis using a representative panel of more than 300,000 Americans and their individual-level browsing behavior, on and off YouTube, from January 2016"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2011.12843","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SI","submitted_at":"2020-11-25T16:00:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY","cs.IR"],"title_canon_sha256":"e368bee1cb02d85557542b69487fea200319744888dbffa51879cc1648962e32","abstract_canon_sha256":"94d13899c7f399e5de250d9bcd1c1141eac08ba3b3e4b84052e8f9bb65e049ff"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018395Z","signature_b64":"Jy9uQBMXyGUzXJVzqyxBUdibAB92MViDuTo5SGnaMLu4ZQ5BP/nNO4RlOgpvj5BnzCk+4ED14pCKsbSGdrF+AA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"76febd438a60e9c951ef1c2e1d02d20d2c01e6f9e9799ce62f41eeeecc854f31","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018000Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018000Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Aaron Clauset, Amir Ghasemian, David M. Rothschild, Duncan J. Watts, Homa Hosseinmardi, Markus Mobius","submitted_at":"2020-11-25T16:00:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Although it is under-studied relative to other social media platforms, YouTube is arguably the largest and most engaging online media consumption platform in the world. Recently, YouTube's scale has fueled concerns that YouTube users are being radicalized via a combination of biased recommendations and ostensibly apolitical anti-woke channels, both of which have been claimed to direct attention to radical political content. Here we test this hypothesis using a representative panel of more than 300,000 Americans and their individual-level browsing behavior, on and off YouTube, from January 2016"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2011.12843","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2011.12843/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2011.12843","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018060+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2011.12843v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018060+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2011.12843","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018060+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"O37L2Q4KMDU4","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018060+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPP","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018060+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"O37L2Q4K","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018060+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.17831","citing_title":"TikTok's recommendations skewed towards Republican content during the 2024 U.S. presidential race","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/O37L2Q4K"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/O37L2Q4K","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2011.12843&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/O37L2Q4KMDU4SUPPDQXB2AWSBU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018060+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:05:25.018060+00:00"}