{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX","short_pith_number":"pith:O47E4USH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"773e4e52473f9bf9d2335fd1c119fe8de89515567892fe271979a5cb96602772","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.18510","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A subgroup-aware scoring approach to the study of effect modification in observational studies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Dylan S. Small, Yijun Fan","submitted_at":"2024-11-27T16:58:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Effect modification means the size of a treatment effect varies with an observed covariate. Generally speaking, a larger treatment effect with more stable error terms is less sensitive to bias. Thus, we might be able to conclude that a study is less sensitive to unmeasured bias by using these subgroups experiencing larger treatment effects. Lee et al. (2018) proposed the submax method that leverages the joint distribution of test statistics from subgroups to draw a firmer conclusion if effect modification occurs. However, one version of the submax method uses M-statistics as the test statistic"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.18510","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2024-11-27T16:58:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"f1f913fa80394004083edb49b209e5a886310cf4ebcabcdc6c24b969ac32c233","abstract_canon_sha256":"92f9c791eb2a335bbe5f70652e263a2b21dc6e49b595d8811b869edb98f5bc07"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450959Z","signature_b64":"Uf+0eQX8zO5798eTKh9NM7nLqVru13qjeGOwX9c2abtlI6oO1NVNrVyPfRQQqfFhnr40DZrwHSF6969AfPExCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"773e4e52473f9bf9d2335fd1c119fe8de89515567892fe271979a5cb96602772","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450147Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450147Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A subgroup-aware scoring approach to the study of effect modification in observational studies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Dylan S. Small, Yijun Fan","submitted_at":"2024-11-27T16:58:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Effect modification means the size of a treatment effect varies with an observed covariate. Generally speaking, a larger treatment effect with more stable error terms is less sensitive to bias. Thus, we might be able to conclude that a study is less sensitive to unmeasured bias by using these subgroups experiencing larger treatment effects. Lee et al. (2018) proposed the submax method that leverages the joint distribution of test statistics from subgroups to draw a firmer conclusion if effect modification occurs. However, one version of the submax method uses M-statistics as the test statistic"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.18510","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.18510/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.18510","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450296+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.18510v2","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450296+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.18510","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450296+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"O47E4USHH6N7","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450296+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"O47E4USHH6N7TURT","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450296+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"O47E4USH","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450296+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09741","citing_title":"Adaptive discovery of effect modification in matched observational studies","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/O47E4USH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/O47E4USH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.18510&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/O47E4USHH6N7TURTL7I4CGP6RX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450296+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:02:03.450296+00:00"}