{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:OB35U2QS3XMGUJLK7QDWSZU6HN","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"bbd5e9f3fefa885c2a22787135b736f62bae63407214d31cf46d1ce49fb14e88","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-04-03T15:56:38Z","title_canon_sha256":"59581cc8e8ac19c8af26f1d2822d97511168c4e2a45ba37696ff63637509039f"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2604.03136","kind":"arxiv","version":5}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.03136","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.03136v5","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.03136","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OB35U2QS3XMG","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OB35U2QS3XMGUJLK","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OB35U2QS","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:65e5aebc0a8660a43111b401cbf28f4cea88657cf1f42f801c42433c81e50394","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Narrative features alone achieve 93.2% macro-F1 for human vs. AI detection and 68.4% macro-F1 for six-way authorship attribution, retaining over 97% of the performance of models that include stylistic cues."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That the automatically induced discourse-level features capture narrative choices independent of surface stylistic signals and that the parallel corpus of prompts sufficiently controls for content to isolate true narrative differences."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"StoryScope extracts narrative features showing AI stories favor tidy plots and over-explain themes while human stories show more moral ambiguity and temporal complexity, enabling strong detection and attribution."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Narrative features alone distinguish AI fiction from human writing at 93 percent accuracy."}],"snapshot_sha256":"f346c51796a483c39b70f7f30535455d78830204c2d6047f15ed03383dcbc734"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"4ea033bf1e6aaedf50057541176ee1954079f154b1e7f287cbced3cf7527e1ae"},"integrity":{"available":true,"clean":true,"detectors_run":[],"endpoint":"/pith/2604.03136/integrity.json","findings":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938","summary":{"advisory":0,"by_detector":{},"critical":0,"informational":0}},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"As AI-generated fiction becomes increasingly prevalent, questions of authorship and originality are becoming central to how written work is evaluated. While most existing work in this space focuses on identifying surface-level signatures of AI writing, we ask instead whether AI-generated stories can be distinguished from human ones without relying on stylistic signals, focusing on discourse-level narrative choices such as character agency and chronological discontinuity. We propose StoryScope, a pipeline that automatically induces a fine-grained, interpretable feature space of discourse-level ","authors_text":"Chau Minh Pham, Jenna Russell, John Wieting, Mohit Iyyer, Rishanth Rajendhran","cross_cats":[],"headline":"Narrative features alone distinguish AI fiction from human writing at 93 percent accuracy.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-04-03T15:56:38Z","title":"StoryScope: Investigating idiosyncrasies in AI fiction"},"references":{"count":0,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":0,"sample":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2604.03136","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-13T20:21:18.491973Z","id":"f798570f-9403-473c-ae8d-f084c80a9cdb","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"StoryScope extracts narrative features showing AI stories favor tidy plots and over-explain themes while human stories show more moral ambiguity and temporal complexity, enabling strong detection and attribution.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Narrative features alone distinguish AI fiction from human writing at 93 percent accuracy.","strongest_claim":"Narrative features alone achieve 93.2% macro-F1 for human vs. AI detection and 68.4% macro-F1 for six-way authorship attribution, retaining over 97% of the performance of models that include stylistic cues.","weakest_assumption":"That the automatically induced discourse-level features capture narrative choices independent of surface stylistic signals and that the parallel corpus of prompts sufficiently controls for content to isolate true narrative differences."}},"verdict_id":"f798570f-9403-473c-ae8d-f084c80a9cdb"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:9409973fb39dda1a3e5e52acb9caf3b537d631618fa58c95c378c77e0b2fbc61","target":"record","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"bbd5e9f3fefa885c2a22787135b736f62bae63407214d31cf46d1ce49fb14e88","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-04-03T15:56:38Z","title_canon_sha256":"59581cc8e8ac19c8af26f1d2822d97511168c4e2a45ba37696ff63637509039f"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2604.03136","kind":"arxiv","version":5}},"canonical_sha256":"7077da6a12ddd86a256afc0769669e3b576bba721167dc7650c540c01dc28d2e","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"7077da6a12ddd86a256afc0769669e3b576bba721167dc7650c540c01dc28d2e","first_computed_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34.072940Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34.072940Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"MLc9EeO4ioYTIU1hus+HRcLKD6GYV00OTxbXaBO3lbTsAnhk61/IH1II37eEmhvJ0mvOixZJlRGim+5eor4ZCA==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-08-04T02:40:34.075460Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2604.03136","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":5}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:9409973fb39dda1a3e5e52acb9caf3b537d631618fa58c95c378c77e0b2fbc61","sha256:65e5aebc0a8660a43111b401cbf28f4cea88657cf1f42f801c42433c81e50394"],"state_sha256":"3c3ad3db340a191cabcc667d9bed28f11d798a5c530a13e5d57336c2e20dfe9d"}