{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC","short_pith_number":"pith:OBDZRVAY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"704798d418e88be2b53f6af2bac783c8b34ffcc09bec65aec57994718c71fbf7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.20351","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Approaching upper bounds to resonant nonlinear optical susceptibilities with inverse-designed quantum wells","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.optics","authors_text":"Francesco Monticone, Hao Li, Owen D. Miller, Theodoros T. Koutserimpas","submitted_at":"2024-09-30T14:50:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We develop a unified framework for identifying bounds to maximum resonant nonlinear optical susceptibilities, and for \"inverse designing\" quantum-well structures that can approach such bounds. In special cases (e.g. second-harmonic generation) we observe that known bounds, a variety of optimal design techniques, and previous experimental measurements nearly coincide. But for many cases (e.g. second-order sum-frequency generation, third-order processes), there is a sizeable gap between the known bounds and previous optimal designs. We sharpen the bounds and use our inverse-design approach acros"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.20351","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.optics","submitted_at":"2024-09-30T14:50:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"40ddccb0faa8d1f14d7aba63760d8b32d352fc13b389672e13fd48f4b635a01f","abstract_canon_sha256":"230e2541d2b004926f3952e4afea7751b16beda79d2e8505b1d4f4fc5c845f6a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135631Z","signature_b64":"pp0MTiLZNbcPCzkYRY31OKNkZPdl62SEaxgyt9t9E4MxI3PbZ2rg9325ENYUkK0q/J03HegL4vqqkUx/J/skCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"704798d418e88be2b53f6af2bac783c8b34ffcc09bec65aec57994718c71fbf7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135123Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135123Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Approaching upper bounds to resonant nonlinear optical susceptibilities with inverse-designed quantum wells","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.optics","authors_text":"Francesco Monticone, Hao Li, Owen D. Miller, Theodoros T. Koutserimpas","submitted_at":"2024-09-30T14:50:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We develop a unified framework for identifying bounds to maximum resonant nonlinear optical susceptibilities, and for \"inverse designing\" quantum-well structures that can approach such bounds. In special cases (e.g. second-harmonic generation) we observe that known bounds, a variety of optimal design techniques, and previous experimental measurements nearly coincide. But for many cases (e.g. second-order sum-frequency generation, third-order processes), there is a sizeable gap between the known bounds and previous optimal designs. We sharpen the bounds and use our inverse-design approach acros"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.20351","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.20351/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.20351","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135181+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.20351v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135181+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.20351","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135181+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OBDZRVAY5CF6","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135181+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135181+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OBDZRVAY","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135181+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20497","citing_title":"Maximum Q-factor of planar inductors","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OBDZRVAY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OBDZRVAY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.20351&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OBDZRVAY5CF6FNJ7NLZLVR4DZC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135181+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:13:42.135181+00:00"}