{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR","short_pith_number":"pith:OBEXHO2M","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"704973bb4cb26ce0074d3af3ec157ea4510429f7b949fff19dce7e1255a55495","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.12537","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Biprofile Deviation Logic: Report-Replacement Frames and Audit Witnesses","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Biprofile deviation logic proves sound and complete for abstract report-replacement frames Dev(N).","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Baris Basaran, Faruk Alpay","submitted_at":"2026-05-04T10:56:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Biprofile deviation logic models strategic social choice states as pairs $(R,P)$, where $R$ is the true profile used for welfare comparisons and $P$ is the submitted report profile used by the rule. Coalition modalities replace only the reports of the coalition, and their relations satisfy the fixed law $E_C \\circ E_D = E_{C \\cup D}$. The paper proves soundness and completeness of $H_{\\mathrm{bp}}$ for the abstract frame class $\\mathrm{Dev}(N)$, with the reverse-composition midpoint displayed inside the canonical proof. It then separates abstract $\\mathrm{Dev}(N)$-components from genuine repor"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.12537","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LO","submitted_at":"2026-05-04T10:56:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"27d581700bde558de298e0f6fed1afc91030612206810cbb91d51060606e5740","abstract_canon_sha256":"37d7a7e3771211e408f6cfa039a580f1af642a5cc6869acfec7bd67838eca8f1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:02.435235Z","signature_b64":"PGkZQ8bS9cN3sOTDPeRduMfJA6W//A9YXKTBLmPioCKZpKGT+IyDnxwe3LTf1AO5Zn6LFsuJnQAiLrpFv5ZEBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"704973bb4cb26ce0074d3af3ec157ea4510429f7b949fff19dce7e1255a55495","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:02.434637Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:02.434637Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Biprofile Deviation Logic: Report-Replacement Frames and Audit Witnesses","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Biprofile deviation logic proves sound and complete for abstract report-replacement frames Dev(N).","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Baris Basaran, Faruk Alpay","submitted_at":"2026-05-04T10:56:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Biprofile deviation logic models strategic social choice states as pairs $(R,P)$, where $R$ is the true profile used for welfare comparisons and $P$ is the submitted report profile used by the rule. Coalition modalities replace only the reports of the coalition, and their relations satisfy the fixed law $E_C \\circ E_D = E_{C \\cup D}$. The paper proves soundness and completeness of $H_{\\mathrm{bp}}$ for the abstract frame class $\\mathrm{Dev}(N)$, with the reverse-composition midpoint displayed inside the canonical proof. It then separates abstract $\\mathrm{Dev}(N)$-components from genuine repor"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"The paper proves soundness and completeness of H_bp for the abstract frame class Dev(N), with the reverse-composition midpoint displayed inside the canonical proof. It then separates abstract Dev(N)-components from genuine report-coordinate products by coordinate separation.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The coalition modalities satisfy the fixed law E_C ∘ E_D = E_{C ∪ D} for all coalitions C and D.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Biprofile deviation logic proves soundness and completeness of H_bp for Dev(N) frames and introduces typed manipulation witnesses, boundary-row theorem, and factor-closure criterion for auditing report changes.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Biprofile deviation logic proves sound and complete for abstract report-replacement frames Dev(N).","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"054442decc6eef24e1e82943b8b5178bbebc3ebc36e0157271b145dba8f39107"},"source":{"id":"2605.12537","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"7a2a6cee-afe1-47c7-af0f-749454ffa738","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-14T22:06:50.851429Z","strongest_claim":"The paper proves soundness and completeness of H_bp for the abstract frame class Dev(N), with the reverse-composition midpoint displayed inside the canonical proof. It then separates abstract Dev(N)-components from genuine report-coordinate products by coordinate separation.","one_line_summary":"Biprofile deviation logic proves soundness and completeness of H_bp for Dev(N) frames and introduces typed manipulation witnesses, boundary-row theorem, and factor-closure criterion for auditing report changes.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The coalition modalities satisfy the fixed law E_C ∘ E_D = E_{C ∪ D} for all coalitions C and D.","pith_extraction_headline":"Biprofile deviation logic proves sound and complete for abstract report-replacement frames Dev(N)."},"references":{"count":28,"sample":[{"doi":"10.3390/g8040046","year":null,"title":"Representations of Political Power Structures by Strategically Stable Game Forms: A Survey.Games2017,8(4), 46","work_id":"cd4c832f-cb78-4643-beb5-cfd131e72efa","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-30227-8_5","year":2004,"title":"Knowledge-Theoretic Properties of Strategic Voting","work_id":"fa450b38-3c6a-4602-9307-bb09cdd4d8a3","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2013,"title":"Strategic Voting and the Logic of Knowledge","work_id":"13a76e05-39d7-4824-9755-8bbc7f7c976e","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1007/s10992-011-","year":null,"title":"Reasoning about Social Choice Functions","work_id":"2ccad3e0-dd63-4b7a-afad-57504780265d","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1007/s10458-016-9328-6","year":null,"title":"Proving Classical Theorems of Social Choice Theory in Modal Logic.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems2016,30(5), 963–989","work_id":"c1227689-c1ca-4450-96fe-4ee1107b758e","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":28,"snapshot_sha256":"d5fde69c867091085881347af05bd2d3486994fbb8d39fa974db1be7eb5199a9","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.12537","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:02.434746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.12537v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:02.434746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.12537","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:02.434746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OBEXHO2MWJWO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2N","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OBEXHO2M","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OBEXHO2M"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OBEXHO2M","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.12537&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OBEXHO2MWJWOAB2NHLZ6YFL6UR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:02.434746+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:02.434746+00:00"}