{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5","short_pith_number":"pith:OCYPQW5M","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"70b0f85bac053aa6934fe70824b2a02f7df1811b3035c5c4313d4a612e15fa57","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2509.00462","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"AI Self-preferencing in Algorithmic Hiring: Empirical Evidence and Insights","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Gujie Li, Jane Yi Jiang, Jiannan Xu","submitted_at":"2025-08-30T11:40:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"As artificial intelligence (AI) tools become widely adopted, large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved on both sides of decision-making processes, ranging from hiring to content moderation. This dual adoption raises a critical question: do LLMs systematically favor content that resembles their own outputs? Prior research in computer science has identified self-preference bias -- the tendency of LLMs to favor their own generated content -- but its real-world implications have not been empirically evaluated. We focus on the hiring context, where job applicants often rely on LLMs to "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2509.00462","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2025-08-30T11:40:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"9979c112223414bb798230166093f5e405498e2f2d4f11fa38417e9d2a516a4e","abstract_canon_sha256":"58b4474a803c6f1977a4c2c45b8b63208e1e94ec52072001f77217ea99ad4bc3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.066009Z","signature_b64":"VS8Z7lvlI0Yp9HEh0SkwrqN3xMxeHx9fJFpDRvcO6xoK1ZbbQnV7aEAG3vT9pI7FHrxpCkJI7v7ygeEP+gazBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"70b0f85bac053aa6934fe70824b2a02f7df1811b3035c5c4313d4a612e15fa57","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.065476Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.065476Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"AI Self-preferencing in Algorithmic Hiring: Empirical Evidence and Insights","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Gujie Li, Jane Yi Jiang, Jiannan Xu","submitted_at":"2025-08-30T11:40:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"As artificial intelligence (AI) tools become widely adopted, large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved on both sides of decision-making processes, ranging from hiring to content moderation. This dual adoption raises a critical question: do LLMs systematically favor content that resembles their own outputs? Prior research in computer science has identified self-preference bias -- the tendency of LLMs to favor their own generated content -- but its real-world implications have not been empirically evaluated. We focus on the hiring context, where job applicants often rely on LLMs to "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2509.00462","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2509.00462/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2509.00462","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.065550+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2509.00462v4","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.065550+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.00462","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.065550+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OCYPQW5MAU5K","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.065550+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.065550+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OCYPQW5M","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.065550+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.24737","citing_title":"Who judges the judges? Governance from metrics: a runtime framework for continuous LLM compliance monitoring","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OCYPQW5M"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OCYPQW5M","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2509.00462&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OCYPQW5MAU5KNE2P44ECJMVAF5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.065550+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:09.065550+00:00"}