{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI","short_pith_number":"pith:ODBXQHTB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"70c3781e61ff8b65de100d9ee6ad983a2b63bb3c6c152de2a369cc5eb0df4207","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.00788","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Behavioral Augmentation of UML Class Diagrams: An Empirical Study of Large Language Models for Method Generation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Djaber Rouabhia, Ismail Hadjadj","submitted_at":"2025-06-01T02:33:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Automating the enrichment of UML class diagrams with behavioral methods from natural language use cases is a significant challenge. This study evaluates nine large language models (LLMs) in augmenting a methodless UML diagram (21 classes, 17 relationships) using 21 structured waste-management use cases. A total of 90 diagrams (3,373 methods) were assessed across six metrics: method quantity, signature richness (visibility, names, parameters, return types), annotation completeness (linking to use cases/actions), structural fidelity, syntactic correctness (PlantUML compilation), and naming conve"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.00788","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2025-06-01T02:33:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"5cb9a10c2e78916ed446870298ee4f8365f28ffadc281079868d62113abe6941","abstract_canon_sha256":"902123df61927318793abdadcea28894e76bbd564212da7c8f76f8fb0e657f4a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.433458Z","signature_b64":"0UfFR9Hj9+OFy6XpS74x6gVoA83eQyaoSs5Tmpsxg6qz47qMlwKpmSIxnNpXj+I36jf7+47Z9hK4aW/7jxZwDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"70c3781e61ff8b65de100d9ee6ad983a2b63bb3c6c152de2a369cc5eb0df4207","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.432999Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.432999Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Behavioral Augmentation of UML Class Diagrams: An Empirical Study of Large Language Models for Method Generation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Djaber Rouabhia, Ismail Hadjadj","submitted_at":"2025-06-01T02:33:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Automating the enrichment of UML class diagrams with behavioral methods from natural language use cases is a significant challenge. This study evaluates nine large language models (LLMs) in augmenting a methodless UML diagram (21 classes, 17 relationships) using 21 structured waste-management use cases. A total of 90 diagrams (3,373 methods) were assessed across six metrics: method quantity, signature richness (visibility, names, parameters, return types), annotation completeness (linking to use cases/actions), structural fidelity, syntactic correctness (PlantUML compilation), and naming conve"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.00788","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.00788/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.00788","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.433055+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.00788v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.433055+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.00788","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.433055+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ODBXQHTB76FW","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.433055+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.433055+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ODBXQHTB","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.433055+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.14967","citing_title":"MermaidSeqBench: An Evaluation Benchmark for NL-to-Mermaid Sequence Diagram Generation","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.00851","citing_title":"Reliability of Large Language Models for Design Synthesis: An Empirical Study of Variance, Prompt Sensitivity, and Method Scaffolding","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ODBXQHTB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ODBXQHTB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.00788&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ODBXQHTB76FWLXQQBWPONLMYHI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.433055+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:13:40.433055+00:00"}