{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY","short_pith_number":"pith:OEWE6KK4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"712c4f295cad1ac18734e742ae99817e10f65e5c1357ebb76bac780aeb578699","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.05741","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Toxic behavior silences online political conversations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Gabriela Juncosa, Gerardo Iniguez, Julia Koltai, Taha Yasseri","submitted_at":"2024-12-07T20:39:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantifying how individuals react to social influence is crucial for tackling collective political behavior online. While many studies of opinion in public forums focus on social feedback, they often overlook the potential for human interactions to result in self-censorship. Here, we investigate political deliberation in online spaces by exploring the hypothesis that individuals may refrain from expressing minority opinions publicly due to being exposed to toxic behavior. Analyzing conversations under YouTube videos from six prominent US news outlets around the 2020 US presidential elections, "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.05741","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SI","submitted_at":"2024-12-07T20:39:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"09ba42ad57d4289a7a0d448e52389607dc662d3c491e9758407a7e4270669aac","abstract_canon_sha256":"180dcf5ca695bc67d427b03120f91de71f5d5a9533ae8252b7b319981e213094"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135843Z","signature_b64":"RZoFw4IHQGHx8klsYJdrCGBSHsimsz2+1WN0mhzmK61AjlaTxE/vaIwLB+6ZCSLCa63NZihiJqxOB2FHKyncAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"712c4f295cad1ac18734e742ae99817e10f65e5c1357ebb76bac780aeb578699","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135357Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135357Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Toxic behavior silences online political conversations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Gabriela Juncosa, Gerardo Iniguez, Julia Koltai, Taha Yasseri","submitted_at":"2024-12-07T20:39:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantifying how individuals react to social influence is crucial for tackling collective political behavior online. While many studies of opinion in public forums focus on social feedback, they often overlook the potential for human interactions to result in self-censorship. Here, we investigate political deliberation in online spaces by exploring the hypothesis that individuals may refrain from expressing minority opinions publicly due to being exposed to toxic behavior. Analyzing conversations under YouTube videos from six prominent US news outlets around the 2020 US presidential elections, "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.05741","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.05741/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.05741","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135424+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.05741v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135424+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.05741","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135424+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OEWE6KK4VUNM","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135424+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135424+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OEWE6KK4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135424+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.09465","citing_title":"Silence and Noise: Self-censorship and Opinion Expression on Social Media","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OEWE6KK4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OEWE6KK4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.05741&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OEWE6KK4VUNMDBZU45BK5GMBPY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135424+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:46:08.135424+00:00"}