{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365","short_pith_number":"pith:OF3VEPU6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7177523e9e1299fb5296b7e440c51bf74d7ac7f46c73309d0480956f365a0b77","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.11514","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Counterfactual Debating with Preset Stances for Hallucination Elimination of LLMs","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fuli Feng, Hui Lin, Moxin Li, Wenjie Wang, Yi Fang","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T13:21:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various natural language processing tasks but struggle with hallucination issues. Existing solutions have considered utilizing LLMs' inherent reasoning abilities to alleviate hallucination, such as self-correction and diverse sampling methods. However, these methods often overtrust LLMs' initial answers due to inherent biases. The key to alleviating this issue lies in overriding LLMs' inherent biases for answer inspection. To this end, we propose a CounterFactual Multi-Agent Debate (CFMAD) framework. CFMAD presets the stances of LLMs to override their inhe"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.11514","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T13:21:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c50f67705a3fe0356b914fd20061e863f7396ffea374ed231490a21d80c50415","abstract_canon_sha256":"20a67d5805c2c0746c7207d3a487e2670e0d95966f94cf710d5c4a770cb1d20c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.818442Z","signature_b64":"hBRRqSVtMT5xBsFvNENv7H3IF0RsMffHh5/x5msW83EQ1lASiRkwPE68RgeOXRYpXa6cs05DgdEwVcnT1f/+Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7177523e9e1299fb5296b7e440c51bf74d7ac7f46c73309d0480956f365a0b77","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.817951Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.817951Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Counterfactual Debating with Preset Stances for Hallucination Elimination of LLMs","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fuli Feng, Hui Lin, Moxin Li, Wenjie Wang, Yi Fang","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T13:21:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various natural language processing tasks but struggle with hallucination issues. Existing solutions have considered utilizing LLMs' inherent reasoning abilities to alleviate hallucination, such as self-correction and diverse sampling methods. However, these methods often overtrust LLMs' initial answers due to inherent biases. The key to alleviating this issue lies in overriding LLMs' inherent biases for answer inspection. To this end, we propose a CounterFactual Multi-Agent Debate (CFMAD) framework. CFMAD presets the stances of LLMs to override their inhe"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.11514","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.11514/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.11514","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.818015+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.11514v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.818015+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.11514","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.818015+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OF3VEPU6CKM7","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.818015+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUW","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.818015+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OF3VEPU6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.818015+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.00987","citing_title":"Causal MAS: A Survey of Large Language Model Architectures for Discovery and Effect Estimation","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OF3VEPU6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OF3VEPU6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.11514&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OF3VEPU6CKM7WUUWW7SEBRI365/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.818015+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:13.818015+00:00"}