{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC","short_pith_number":"pith:OFNJK2MS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"715a956992f5d7e7ba3008781bb507089a639be0f3f152957995f0e2baa2ecbb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1710.03783","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Why Black Hole Information Loss is Paradoxical","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"David Wallace","submitted_at":"2017-10-10T18:53:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"I distinguish between two versions of the black hole information-loss paradox. The first arises from apparent failure of unitarity on the spacetime of a completely evaporating black hole, which appears to be non-globally-hyperbolic; this is the most commonly discussed version of the paradox in the foundational and semipopular literature, and the case for calling it `paradoxical' is less than compelling. But the second arises from a clash between a fully-statistical-mechanical interpretation of black hole evaporation and the quantum-field-theoretic description used in derivations of the Hawking"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1710.03783","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2017-10-10T18:53:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"1ec75bb588edc2c35280734d0f8e9b7cd53b47a86a4a76eb6e7b134b49340ece","abstract_canon_sha256":"685bd4a466ac94a5c288fb51d968da9f3b8668dac171a4cd0a9fe4995e554737"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:13:10.894927Z","signature_b64":"lIcE5pYXUop2IYngoEbrLRrq+olYZq83TF1d8OgboWtWFMED2YLV77ZyIk77zfxs/DkRP/096ci3DmuOQt8QBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"715a956992f5d7e7ba3008781bb507089a639be0f3f152957995f0e2baa2ecbb","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:13:10.894201Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:13:10.894201Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Why Black Hole Information Loss is Paradoxical","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"David Wallace","submitted_at":"2017-10-10T18:53:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"I distinguish between two versions of the black hole information-loss paradox. The first arises from apparent failure of unitarity on the spacetime of a completely evaporating black hole, which appears to be non-globally-hyperbolic; this is the most commonly discussed version of the paradox in the foundational and semipopular literature, and the case for calling it `paradoxical' is less than compelling. But the second arises from a clash between a fully-statistical-mechanical interpretation of black hole evaporation and the quantum-field-theoretic description used in derivations of the Hawking"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1710.03783","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1710.03783","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:13:10.894333+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1710.03783v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:13:10.894333+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1710.03783","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:13:10.894333+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OFNJK2MS6XL6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:34.259226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:34.259226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OFNJK2MS","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:34.259226+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OFNJK2MS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OFNJK2MS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1710.03783&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OFNJK2MS6XL6PORQBB4BXNIHBC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:13:10.894333+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:13:10.894333+00:00"}