{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7","short_pith_number":"pith:OKMTJRGF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"729934c4c54ec652248b6a7fe0138997c749ff1a17cc3258d31df343839c6d20","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.15295","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"GESD: Beyond Outcome-Oriented Fairness","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"GESD measures fairness by tracking how consistently machine learning models explain their predictions across demographic subgroups.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Gideon Popoola, John Sheppard","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T18:10:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly deployed in high-stakes decision-making domains such as loan approvals, hiring, and recidivism predictions. While existing fairness metrics (e.g., statistical parity, equal opportunity) effectively quantify outcome-oriented disparities, they offer limited insight into the procedure or explanation behind biased decisions. To address this gap, we propose Group-level Explanation Stability Disparity (GESD), a \\textit{procedural-oriented} fairness metric that measures disparities in the stability, robustness, and sensitivity of model explanations ac"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.15295","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T18:10:57Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"1f1f6439c864d6f2b289b47a2f866d75f99525d8e6587ee899bb6087e4be5dfc","abstract_canon_sha256":"b49f722b1fb25b77c7806681ec1c42166b2c3cef5e48fc58f42eb2bae1ed4243"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.174110Z","signature_b64":"1chqexNJFE03nzParwBBEriAnOVNbfEgjIhb30Ct3rboHc2FoNhd7iJSrU3tAoZWI9iCr8KH9RxxbA9i3uV9CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"729934c4c54ec652248b6a7fe0138997c749ff1a17cc3258d31df343839c6d20","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.173372Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.173372Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"GESD: Beyond Outcome-Oriented Fairness","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"GESD measures fairness by tracking how consistently machine learning models explain their predictions across demographic subgroups.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Gideon Popoola, John Sheppard","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T18:10:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly deployed in high-stakes decision-making domains such as loan approvals, hiring, and recidivism predictions. While existing fairness metrics (e.g., statistical parity, equal opportunity) effectively quantify outcome-oriented disparities, they offer limited insight into the procedure or explanation behind biased decisions. To address this gap, we propose Group-level Explanation Stability Disparity (GESD), a \\textit{procedural-oriented} fairness metric that measures disparities in the stability, robustness, and sensitivity of model explanations ac"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"GESD effectively captures group-wise discrepancies in explanation quality, and that FEU improves both utility and fairness over state-of-the-art methods.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That measuring disparities in explanation stability, robustness, and sensitivity across subgroups provides a meaningful and model-agnostic indicator of procedural fairness without requiring additional assumptions about the underlying explainer or data distribution.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"The paper proposes GESD, a procedural fairness metric for group disparities in explanation stability and robustness, and integrates it into the FEU multi-objective optimization framework.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"GESD measures fairness by tracking how consistently machine learning models explain their predictions across demographic subgroups.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"1ca1dc8307a2f54bc4e5b4dab6073b2f5d260198e71334d69e3ef06f5cdd119b"},"source":{"id":"2605.15295","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"0cd32de7-fc37-47ae-8460-3f4d0d03193e","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T16:26:09.804352Z","strongest_claim":"GESD effectively captures group-wise discrepancies in explanation quality, and that FEU improves both utility and fairness over state-of-the-art methods.","one_line_summary":"The paper proposes GESD, a procedural fairness metric for group disparities in explanation stability and robustness, and integrates it into the FEU multi-objective optimization framework.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That measuring disparities in explanation stability, robustness, and sensitivity across subgroups provides a meaningful and model-agnostic indicator of procedural fairness without requiring additional assumptions about the underlying explainer or data distribution.","pith_extraction_headline":"GESD measures fairness by tracking how consistently machine learning models explain their predictions across demographic subgroups."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.15295/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T16:36:04.312407Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T16:31:18.364619Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T14:41:54.234657Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T13:33:22.783854Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"a98ec30a092bbb9db1e30665e9f52baf73556af5ee2dcf02d682746a59cbc5fc"},"references":{"count":29,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2016,"title":"Big data’s disparate impact,","work_id":"8ef3fb2b-65b4-43d7-8193-87036d2fa1ed","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"Investigating and mitigating the performance–fairness tradeoff via protected-category sampling,","work_id":"f9665236-7427-4074-b52c-1cdb2354e670","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2017,"title":"Optimized pre-processing for discrimination prevention","work_id":"d285c33d-8270-4df5-a8ee-82dc61103423","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2017,"title":"Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments,","work_id":"7a40f3a2-2b53-4d63-bed0-b01fd10cf685","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2016,"title":"Equality of opportunity in super- vised learning,","work_id":"333f5ab2-14d7-4d29-a133-71e893194478","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":29,"snapshot_sha256":"c2753c2a08086e38f4cb6240f458c30266967cba1eb89159d91fdb882f4493f3","internal_anchors":1},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.15295","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.173483+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.15295v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.173483+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.15295","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.173483+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OKMTJRGFJ3DF","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.173483+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJEL","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.173483+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OKMTJRGF","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.173483+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OKMTJRGF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OKMTJRGF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.15295&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OKMTJRGFJ3DFEJELNJ76AE4JS7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.173483+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:00:51.173483+00:00"}