{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45","short_pith_number":"pith:OL7PMT4Z","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"72fef64f9912786d34260526f8e4eee75e64a959ba1d5c5a87501ac14767e02b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2105.05176","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Renormalizability of alternative theories of gravity: differences between power counting and entropy argument","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Francesco Bajardi, Francesco Bascone, Salvatore Capozziello","submitted_at":"2021-05-11T16:28:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is well known that General Relativity cannot be considered under the standard of a perturbatively renormalizable quantum field theory, but asymptotic safety is taken into account as a possibility for the formulation of gravity as a non-perturbative renormalizable theory. Recently, the entropy argument has however stepped into the discussion claiming for a \"no-go\" to the asymptotic safety argument. In this paper, we present simple counter-examples, considering alternative theories of gravity, to the entropy argument as further indications, among others, on the possible flows in the assumptio"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2105.05176","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2021-05-11T16:28:44Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"a4366a5fbc7188e29be6f82b6ee842d52e59b38d60ec0c1953a3feb7a4752591","abstract_canon_sha256":"d246a75115b2895bb2ebfa01e4f430d74c8a61f3f4f5fc0cd3ba3d2340865dee"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.883271Z","signature_b64":"Axyb3rcKLCWhUFLleAY/YLE4KF5EBJ8p4hMmgs/X14YlEDKl8NNW7UdBgWXL2VweOMY3O4E5S5euFBnByJfTBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"72fef64f9912786d34260526f8e4eee75e64a959ba1d5c5a87501ac14767e02b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.882912Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.882912Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Renormalizability of alternative theories of gravity: differences between power counting and entropy argument","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Francesco Bajardi, Francesco Bascone, Salvatore Capozziello","submitted_at":"2021-05-11T16:28:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is well known that General Relativity cannot be considered under the standard of a perturbatively renormalizable quantum field theory, but asymptotic safety is taken into account as a possibility for the formulation of gravity as a non-perturbative renormalizable theory. Recently, the entropy argument has however stepped into the discussion claiming for a \"no-go\" to the asymptotic safety argument. In this paper, we present simple counter-examples, considering alternative theories of gravity, to the entropy argument as further indications, among others, on the possible flows in the assumptio"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2105.05176","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2105.05176/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2105.05176","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.882961+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2105.05176v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.882961+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2105.05176","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.882961+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OL7PMT4ZCJ4G","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.882961+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBG","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.882961+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OL7PMT4Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.882961+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OL7PMT4Z"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OL7PMT4Z","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2105.05176&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OL7PMT4ZCJ4G2NBGAUTPRZHO45/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.882961+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:35:09.882961+00:00"}