{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4","short_pith_number":"pith:OLFV5BCV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"72cb5e8455d3ec4f401a8aad34c140c71dbd213e89209593953a9e79a55e4be2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.01205","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Epistemic Alignment: A Mediating Framework for User-LLM Knowledge Delivery","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Bill Howe, Hua Shen, Nicholas Clark, Tanushree Mitra","submitted_at":"2025-04-01T21:38:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"LLMs increasingly serve as tools for knowledge acquisition, yet users cannot effectively specify how they want information presented. When users request that LLMs \"cite reputable sources,\" \"express appropriate uncertainty,\" or \"include multiple perspectives,\" they discover that current interfaces provide no structured way to articulate these preferences. The result is prompt sharing folklore: community-specific copied prompts passed through trust relationships rather than based on measured efficacy. We propose the Epistemic Alignment Framework, a set of ten challenges in knowledge transmission"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.01205","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2025-04-01T21:38:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"960d3e682a8565b66953c85663d2187aa9dfcdfde9b20b3fc76b28c574d6e59f","abstract_canon_sha256":"a5c1d978b5585a5d51a214e8b7600a66cf55fd1f33d95b95ba3da71c050eae5d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.894264Z","signature_b64":"6jfCOGR0Ckg9INNxncd1s5kGNfqwzjUlu1MpEB1OkB8AP/IkFIutfBAozBHWIHxC7WvZf75qjLqvuBcXAELEBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"72cb5e8455d3ec4f401a8aad34c140c71dbd213e89209593953a9e79a55e4be2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.893779Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.893779Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Epistemic Alignment: A Mediating Framework for User-LLM Knowledge Delivery","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Bill Howe, Hua Shen, Nicholas Clark, Tanushree Mitra","submitted_at":"2025-04-01T21:38:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"LLMs increasingly serve as tools for knowledge acquisition, yet users cannot effectively specify how they want information presented. When users request that LLMs \"cite reputable sources,\" \"express appropriate uncertainty,\" or \"include multiple perspectives,\" they discover that current interfaces provide no structured way to articulate these preferences. The result is prompt sharing folklore: community-specific copied prompts passed through trust relationships rather than based on measured efficacy. We propose the Epistemic Alignment Framework, a set of ten challenges in knowledge transmission"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.01205","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.01205/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.01205","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.893839+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.01205v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.893839+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.01205","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.893839+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OLFV5BCV2PWE","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.893839+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.893839+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OLFV5BCV","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.893839+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.30481","citing_title":"When English Rewrites Local Knowledge: Global Narrative Dominance in Large Language Models","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23414","citing_title":"When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.10995","citing_title":"A Human-Centric Framework for Data Attribution in Large Language Models","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23136","citing_title":"How Researchers Navigate Accountability, Transparency, and Trust When Using AI Tools in Early-Stage Research: A Think-Aloud Study","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OLFV5BCV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OLFV5BCV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.01205&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OLFV5BCV2PWE6QA2RKWTJQKAY4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.893839+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:43:10.893839+00:00"}