{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB","short_pith_number":"pith:OMGCU4S4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"730c2a725c905703362f9c46718a2b5069ee6d4823dc650c3411a7bdf36e2c60","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1903.04891","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Modelling Competing Legal Arguments using Bayesian Model Comparison and Averaging","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"David Lagnado, Martin Neil, Norman Fenton, Richard D. Gill","submitted_at":"2019-03-07T10:00:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Bayesian models of legal arguments generally aim to produce a single integrated model, combining each of the legal arguments under consideration. This combined approach implicitly assumes that variables and their relationships can be represented without any contradiction or misalignment, and in a way that makes sense with respect to the competing argument narratives. This paper describes a novel approach to compare and 'average' Bayesian models of legal arguments that have been built independently and with no attempt to make them consistent in terms of variables, causal assumptions or parametr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1903.04891","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2019-03-07T10:00:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3bc958ffba0cf0100e7201866404d7642b77520c8be3842f7f836be3edfcd5d4","abstract_canon_sha256":"9a3a82065c8465e088b7e9eb507cad82d914963a9d8de090a88def916d4ac36f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333399Z","signature_b64":"xlSXKOEG6EE9VfMBOXA7ZVcsUQXnfe9mlPV/mYIeMN6LAuut9OeLHzA0tK9XLtryl0a4a9yz0JaKtLGpQ0OJAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"730c2a725c905703362f9c46718a2b5069ee6d4823dc650c3411a7bdf36e2c60","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333006Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333006Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Modelling Competing Legal Arguments using Bayesian Model Comparison and Averaging","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"David Lagnado, Martin Neil, Norman Fenton, Richard D. Gill","submitted_at":"2019-03-07T10:00:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Bayesian models of legal arguments generally aim to produce a single integrated model, combining each of the legal arguments under consideration. This combined approach implicitly assumes that variables and their relationships can be represented without any contradiction or misalignment, and in a way that makes sense with respect to the competing argument narratives. This paper describes a novel approach to compare and 'average' Bayesian models of legal arguments that have been built independently and with no attempt to make them consistent in terms of variables, causal assumptions or parametr"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1903.04891","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1903.04891/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1903.04891","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333057+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1903.04891v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333057+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1903.04891","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333057+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OMGCU4S4SBLQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333057+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRP","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333057+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OMGCU4S4","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333057+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OMGCU4S4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OMGCU4S4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1903.04891&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OMGCU4S4SBLQGNRPTRDHDCRLKB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333057+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:37:16.333057+00:00"}