{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK","short_pith_number":"pith:ORBJVSYV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"74429acb15913d4a0b0d54c0bdbf22928c0b7f13f45026679911d5bbcab16a8a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2203.08788","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Are Shortest Rationales the Best Explanations for Human Understanding?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.HC","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Hua Shen, Ting-Hao 'Kenneth' Huang, Tongshuang Wu, Wenbo Guo","submitted_at":"2022-03-16T17:52:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"Existing self-explaining models typically favor extracting the shortest possible rationales - snippets of an input text \"responsible for\" corresponding output - to explain the model prediction, with the assumption that shorter rationales are more intuitive to humans. However, this assumption has yet to be validated. Is the shortest rationale indeed the most human-understandable? To answer this question, we design a self-explaining model, LimitedInk, which allows users to extract rationales at any target length. Compared to existing baselines, LimitedInk achieves compatible end-task performance"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2203.08788","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2022-03-16T17:52:07Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"64a3d4e528ceb3b0cd49c2a160ce92105b96d685d0350078952c7fa99f4e2f07","abstract_canon_sha256":"ca4058356dfd805a873603eb6acd2af090ccf2db7e3bf8e63413779d2a1bb398"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.963545Z","signature_b64":"2uD0k4nq07ufEaVco5JmnILsHQHn22J7Q6TWsdQ/JTIDFthC5EX+3wVYS0aA66GV7IQVv35t5BQM3tekt/epDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"74429acb15913d4a0b0d54c0bdbf22928c0b7f13f45026679911d5bbcab16a8a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.962788Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.962788Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Are Shortest Rationales the Best Explanations for Human Understanding?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.HC","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Hua Shen, Ting-Hao 'Kenneth' Huang, Tongshuang Wu, Wenbo Guo","submitted_at":"2022-03-16T17:52:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"Existing self-explaining models typically favor extracting the shortest possible rationales - snippets of an input text \"responsible for\" corresponding output - to explain the model prediction, with the assumption that shorter rationales are more intuitive to humans. However, this assumption has yet to be validated. Is the shortest rationale indeed the most human-understandable? To answer this question, we design a self-explaining model, LimitedInk, which allows users to extract rationales at any target length. Compared to existing baselines, LimitedInk achieves compatible end-task performance"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2203.08788","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2203.08788/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2203.08788","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.962842+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2203.08788v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.962842+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2203.08788","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.962842+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ORBJVSYVSE6U","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.962842+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYN","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.962842+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ORBJVSYV","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.962842+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01558","citing_title":"Attention-guided Fine-tuning of Multimodal Large Language Models Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ORBJVSYV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ORBJVSYV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2203.08788&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ORBJVSYVSE6UUCYNKTAL3PZCSK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.962842+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:05:48.962842+00:00"}