{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F","short_pith_number":"pith:OTBYC7E3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"74c3817c9b4e8e51e4e5254d8629cdd95afdad6b9ff7c2effaf3cc9c5cead246","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2604.15343","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When the Loop Closes: Architectural Limits of In-Context Isolation, Metacognitive Co-option, and the Two-Target Design Problem in Human-LLM Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Prompt isolation in human-LLM systems collapses when isolation instructions share the same attention window as emotional self-referential content, producing loss of user agency.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"N. Song, Z. Cheng","submitted_at":"2026-03-14T04:06:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"We report a detailed autoethnographic case study of a single-subject who deliberately constructed and operated a multi-modal prompt-engineering system (System A) designed to externalize cognitive self-regulation onto a large language model (LLM). Within 48 hours of the system's completion, a cascade of observable behavioral changes occurred: voluntary transfer of decision-making authority to the LLM, use of LLM-generated output to deflect external criticism, and a loss of self-initiated reasoning that was independently perceived by two uninformed observers, one of whom subsequently became a co"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.15343","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2026-03-14T04:06:57Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"3906be9bbd4a7eada4c28fbc5312886ce6f8aa0732e265ef75b6afe4d24002bf","abstract_canon_sha256":"27b1a55f81f44eded1e0d81e561dedb5624e0f0c09230f54a56170eaea550750"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.487336Z","signature_b64":"7qNvWQ57xzCZxDh78oM19qCv9g+oBerY8s9sLJRh1DT1LNdIoP5oKU7YxN9Pfcs/qeUuYCfgg5nUtHLT3+H0Ag==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"74c3817c9b4e8e51e4e5254d8629cdd95afdad6b9ff7c2effaf3cc9c5cead246","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.486647Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.486647Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When the Loop Closes: Architectural Limits of In-Context Isolation, Metacognitive Co-option, and the Two-Target Design Problem in Human-LLM Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Prompt isolation in human-LLM systems collapses when isolation instructions share the same attention window as emotional self-referential content, producing loss of user agency.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"N. Song, Z. Cheng","submitted_at":"2026-03-14T04:06:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"We report a detailed autoethnographic case study of a single-subject who deliberately constructed and operated a multi-modal prompt-engineering system (System A) designed to externalize cognitive self-regulation onto a large language model (LLM). Within 48 hours of the system's completion, a cascade of observable behavioral changes occurred: voluntary transfer of decision-making authority to the LLM, use of LLM-generated output to deflect external criticism, and a loss of self-initiated reasoning that was independently perceived by two uninformed observers, one of whom subsequently became a co"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"context contamination, whereby prompt-level isolation instructions co-exist with the very emotional and self-referential material they nominally isolate, rendering the isolation directive structurally ineffective within the attention window","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the observed behavioral changes and loss of self-initiated reasoning were caused by the architectural mixing in the prompt system rather than by other unmeasured factors in the single subject's life or expectations.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"A prompt-based LLM system for externalizing cognitive self-regulation caused closed-loop loss of user agency via context contamination and metacognitive co-option, resolved only by physical disconnection.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Prompt isolation in human-LLM systems collapses when isolation instructions share the same attention window as emotional self-referential content, producing loss of user agency.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"235bfad16e9d4b275457e142c7d57107ff1697f576b30acb6765f04f178b72dd"},"source":{"id":"2604.15343","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"7ceaaf91-1017-4aac-8be5-5362dd0bcc37","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T12:08:01.801034Z","strongest_claim":"context contamination, whereby prompt-level isolation instructions co-exist with the very emotional and self-referential material they nominally isolate, rendering the isolation directive structurally ineffective within the attention window","one_line_summary":"A prompt-based LLM system for externalizing cognitive self-regulation caused closed-loop loss of user agency via context contamination and metacognitive co-option, resolved only by physical disconnection.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the observed behavioral changes and loss of self-initiated reasoning were caused by the architectural mixing in the prompt system rather than by other unmeasured factors in the single subject's life or expectations.","pith_extraction_headline":"Prompt isolation in human-LLM systems collapses when isolation instructions share the same attention window as emotional self-referential content, producing loss of user agency."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.15343/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"41cf75921e85596af33b5ee037058582b00a5455cac4ef195193fb60d9484b2b"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.15343","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.486746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.15343v2","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.486746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.15343","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.486746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OTBYC7E3J2HF","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.486746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHF","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.486746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OTBYC7E3","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.486746+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OTBYC7E3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OTBYC7E3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2604.15343&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OTBYC7E3J2HFDZHFEVGYMKON3F/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.486746+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.486746+00:00"}