{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK","short_pith_number":"pith:OXEK2OUD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"75c8ad3a83472406e2fd6d4495c36bb2b0b9794cf4b7e59a40368e1b2c82c107","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.16839","version":9},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Displacing Science","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Lingfei Wu, Linzhuo Li, Yiling Lin","submitted_at":"2024-02-26T18:58:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent research on the decline in the paper disruption index (D-index) has sparked heated debates among scholars and garnered significant attention from policymakers and research institution leaders globally. To bridge the gap between policymakers' interest and scholars' skepticism about the D-index, we present this article summarizing key insights from our eight-year investigation, including interviews with scientists across nine disciplines and an analysis of 41 million papers over six decades. Our work confirms the decline in disruptive papers, addresses relevant technical concerns, and mak"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.16839","kind":"arxiv","version":9},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2024-02-26T18:58:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"472ca678c4985bece3aae8487a6d1b35775bd36370edfd2929bb5ee640ab403c","abstract_canon_sha256":"5e90498528181c1e62bbe877cadcccfd85bddb615e47a61fe9aba6b415a78a5e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416569Z","signature_b64":"gxsr8F8RJ+xBRFx+gYMBVgq+NBWa2eiNhARPWxgRsoxnYxYWIGTvgA+fotvqADKQCRiRv4k6MJuVa5N2QwI7Ag==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"75c8ad3a83472406e2fd6d4495c36bb2b0b9794cf4b7e59a40368e1b2c82c107","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416117Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416117Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Displacing Science","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Lingfei Wu, Linzhuo Li, Yiling Lin","submitted_at":"2024-02-26T18:58:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent research on the decline in the paper disruption index (D-index) has sparked heated debates among scholars and garnered significant attention from policymakers and research institution leaders globally. To bridge the gap between policymakers' interest and scholars' skepticism about the D-index, we present this article summarizing key insights from our eight-year investigation, including interviews with scientists across nine disciplines and an analysis of 41 million papers over six decades. Our work confirms the decline in disruptive papers, addresses relevant technical concerns, and mak"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.16839","kind":"arxiv","version":9},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.16839/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.16839","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416172+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.16839v9","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416172+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.16839","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416172+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"OXEK2OUDI4SA","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416172+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416172+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"OXEK2OUD","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416172+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.22729","citing_title":"Persistence Paradox in Dynamic Science","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OXEK2OUD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/OXEK2OUD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.16839&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/OXEK2OUDI4SANYX5NVCJLQ3LWK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416172+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:23.416172+00:00"}