{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ","short_pith_number":"pith:P2PPT5CT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7e9ef9f453f4ffd18d6233b01fef297c317291f0aff1af8586b79d501e0e6267","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1802.00791","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Does Planck 2015 polarization favor high redshift reionization?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Chen Heinrich, Wayne Hu","submitted_at":"2018-02-02T18:08:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study the relationship between signatures of high redshift ionization in large-angle CMB polarization power spectra and features in the Planck 2015 data. Using a principal component (PC) ionization basis that is complete to the cosmic variance limit out to $z_{\\rm max}=30,40,50$, we find a robust $>95\\%$ CL preference for ionization at $z>15$ with no preference for $z>40$. This robustness originates from the $\\ell \\sim 10$ region of the data which show high power relative to $\\ell \\le 8$ and result in a poor fit to a steplike model of reionization. Instead by allowing for high redshift reio"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1802.00791","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2018-02-02T18:08:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4661742301be18bb9a94a9491d333b12e161b0b9afd35619fb3e959537678042","abstract_canon_sha256":"51c8c561fe4160df60981ee28316aef4d89e000ddc643697793b49e41825a8d7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:05:32.085272Z","signature_b64":"RbFjK7bVDdSmSGlaYhQNaYy1+d55ZX+yQBTMLvU+QYdcVF+H17Q84nxVYCPrguJ06Zb650MGtrVZv935WmHhDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7e9ef9f453f4ffd18d6233b01fef297c317291f0aff1af8586b79d501e0e6267","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:05:32.084681Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:05:32.084681Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Does Planck 2015 polarization favor high redshift reionization?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Chen Heinrich, Wayne Hu","submitted_at":"2018-02-02T18:08:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study the relationship between signatures of high redshift ionization in large-angle CMB polarization power spectra and features in the Planck 2015 data. Using a principal component (PC) ionization basis that is complete to the cosmic variance limit out to $z_{\\rm max}=30,40,50$, we find a robust $>95\\%$ CL preference for ionization at $z>15$ with no preference for $z>40$. This robustness originates from the $\\ell \\sim 10$ region of the data which show high power relative to $\\ell \\le 8$ and result in a poor fit to a steplike model of reionization. Instead by allowing for high redshift reio"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1802.00791","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1802.00791","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:05:32.084781+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1802.00791v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:05:32.084781+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1802.00791","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:05:32.084781+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"P2PPT5CT6T75","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:43.782077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"P2PPT5CT6T75DDLC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:43.782077+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"P2PPT5CT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:43.782077+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1807.06209","citing_title":"Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters","ref_index":165,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P2PPT5CT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P2PPT5CT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1802.00791&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/P2PPT5CT6T75DDLCGOYB73ZJPQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:05:32.084781+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:05:32.084781+00:00"}