{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA","short_pith_number":"pith:P2QAUORS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7ea00a3a32994984a5763a66fddac56002e801f1bd2184ea311acd7d62df11f6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.18604","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Cognitive-Mechanistic Human Reliability Analysis Framework: A Nuclear Power Plant Case Study","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Haitao Wang, Hongru Zhao, Jiejuan Tong, Jingang Liang, Jun Zhao, Peng Chen, Qianqian Jia, Shunshun Liu, Xingyu Xiao","submitted_at":"2025-04-25T00:46:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Traditional human reliability analysis (HRA) methods, such as IDHEAS-ECA, rely on expert judgment and empirical rules that often overlook the cognitive underpinnings of human error. Moreover, conducting human-in-the-loop experiments for advanced nuclear power plants is increasingly impractical due to novel interfaces and limited operational data. This study proposes a cognitive-mechanistic framework (COGMIF) that enhances the IDHEAS-ECA methodology by integrating an ACT-R-based human digital twin (HDT) with TimeGAN-augmented simulation. The ACT-R model simulates operator cognition, including m"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.18604","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-04-25T00:46:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"78e2e6c9d16d822b6b17f19efbfeb106d23b76e78a9e9dd46a415d4286834d34","abstract_canon_sha256":"58d826ff0fe6ea4cc5f8d49d2130671423c04594f708f73299afd94c421705bd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629691Z","signature_b64":"6mjGz2BJjChuH/B0XcJkW1SnEB3cIWweKUigPS8yTBweKCOtXnzUd13A4DLbz2qrmcOpAW3D8jEEoW2uAAS2Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7ea00a3a32994984a5763a66fddac56002e801f1bd2184ea311acd7d62df11f6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629162Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629162Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Cognitive-Mechanistic Human Reliability Analysis Framework: A Nuclear Power Plant Case Study","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Haitao Wang, Hongru Zhao, Jiejuan Tong, Jingang Liang, Jun Zhao, Peng Chen, Qianqian Jia, Shunshun Liu, Xingyu Xiao","submitted_at":"2025-04-25T00:46:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Traditional human reliability analysis (HRA) methods, such as IDHEAS-ECA, rely on expert judgment and empirical rules that often overlook the cognitive underpinnings of human error. Moreover, conducting human-in-the-loop experiments for advanced nuclear power plants is increasingly impractical due to novel interfaces and limited operational data. This study proposes a cognitive-mechanistic framework (COGMIF) that enhances the IDHEAS-ECA methodology by integrating an ACT-R-based human digital twin (HDT) with TimeGAN-augmented simulation. The ACT-R model simulates operator cognition, including m"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.18604","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.18604/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.18604","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629232+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.18604v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629232+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.18604","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629232+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"P2QAUORSTFEY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629232+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"P2QAUORSTFEYJJLW","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629232+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"P2QAUORS","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629232+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.00066","citing_title":"InSight-R: A Framework for Risk-informed Human Failure Event Identification and Interface-Induced Risk Assessment Driven by AutoGraph","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P2QAUORS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P2QAUORS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.18604&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/P2QAUORSTFEYJJLWHJTP3WWFMA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629232+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:47.629232+00:00"}