{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA","short_pith_number":"pith:P3KFXPTY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7ed45bbe787289182b1a193df93e23103d677e1cc5ecde2c0feff5271cfe9ecd","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.14618","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Opinion dynamics on dense dynamic random graphs","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.PR","authors_text":"Frank den Hollander, Michel Mandjes, Peter Braunsteins, Simone Baldassarri","submitted_at":"2024-10-18T17:16:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider two-opinion voter models on dense dynamic random graphs. Our goal is to understand and describe the occurrence of consensus versus polarisation over long periods of time. The former means that all vertices have the same opinion, the latter means that the vertices split into two communities with different opinions and few disagreeing edges. We consider three models for the joint dynamics of opinions and graphs: one with a one-way feedback and two which are co-evolutionary, i.e., with a two-way feedback. In the first model only coexistence is attainable, meaning that both opinions su"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.14618","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.PR","submitted_at":"2024-10-18T17:16:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"7cc38ff3d15f42a4c34dd856194404ff8d5b499280e1c93c7e859f8770b73cc5","abstract_canon_sha256":"81e2e86ed8af964d8c1fb98cc1ad8402184f3e5714ee5a1a49c0eedbb16958cb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449637Z","signature_b64":"DwdJ0iTRzZdC2RNHWrYGDz6xDUOg2HdLRwDIpeBVr0bnCbTfuGWVftjQ6CsUQlcZNu/soX2EIwTE3QhTq37DCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7ed45bbe787289182b1a193df93e23103d677e1cc5ecde2c0feff5271cfe9ecd","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449166Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449166Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Opinion dynamics on dense dynamic random graphs","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.PR","authors_text":"Frank den Hollander, Michel Mandjes, Peter Braunsteins, Simone Baldassarri","submitted_at":"2024-10-18T17:16:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider two-opinion voter models on dense dynamic random graphs. Our goal is to understand and describe the occurrence of consensus versus polarisation over long periods of time. The former means that all vertices have the same opinion, the latter means that the vertices split into two communities with different opinions and few disagreeing edges. We consider three models for the joint dynamics of opinions and graphs: one with a one-way feedback and two which are co-evolutionary, i.e., with a two-way feedback. In the first model only coexistence is attainable, meaning that both opinions su"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.14618","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.14618/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.14618","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.14618v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.14618","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"P3KFXPTYOKER","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"P3KFXPTY","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449222+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.04280","citing_title":"Mean-Field Analysis of Latent Variable Process Models on Dynamically Evolving Graphs with Feedback Effects","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.11541","citing_title":"Functional central limit theorem for the subgraph count of the voter model on dynamic random graphs","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.06493","citing_title":"Co-evolving vertex and edge dynamics in dense graphs","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P3KFXPTY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P3KFXPTY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.14618&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/P3KFXPTYOKERQKY2DE67SPRDCA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449222+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:27:06.449222+00:00"}