{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6","short_pith_number":"pith:P6KIYNMU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"7f948c359421937131ffe0b50ec2514788d869ab32507fe76172f7d626f6b44d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.18556","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"RDI: An adversarial robustness evaluation metric for deep neural networks based on model statistical features","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Feiyang Wang, Hai Huang, Jialei Song, Tianle Zhang, Xingquan Zuo","submitted_at":"2025-04-16T10:05:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Deep neural networks (DNNs) are highly susceptible to adversarial samples, raising concerns about their reliability in safety-critical tasks. Currently, methods of evaluating adversarial robustness are primarily categorized into attack-based and certified robustness evaluation approaches. The former not only relies on specific attack algorithms but also is highly time-consuming, while the latter due to its analytical nature, is typically difficult to implement for large and complex models. A few studies evaluate model robustness based on the model's decision boundary, but they suffer from low "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.18556","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-04-16T10:05:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"239ac77d9e4f4e09f3bba384c5f47443ad1c9cb5913b0cddca3fd2747a6d2e97","abstract_canon_sha256":"d8aa21a9059d2356b66ef0b8275caa319159b89f811bece9824dee5c80639b37"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.075212Z","signature_b64":"HJ10fqXo47f7OKDMkG4cOAZVwZx8q5tDdfKB5Hsz44DE08qNBzbeM1/DePI5T4H16TVKboh1rwFTmwfV8qs4CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"7f948c359421937131ffe0b50ec2514788d869ab32507fe76172f7d626f6b44d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.074698Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.074698Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"RDI: An adversarial robustness evaluation metric for deep neural networks based on model statistical features","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Feiyang Wang, Hai Huang, Jialei Song, Tianle Zhang, Xingquan Zuo","submitted_at":"2025-04-16T10:05:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Deep neural networks (DNNs) are highly susceptible to adversarial samples, raising concerns about their reliability in safety-critical tasks. Currently, methods of evaluating adversarial robustness are primarily categorized into attack-based and certified robustness evaluation approaches. The former not only relies on specific attack algorithms but also is highly time-consuming, while the latter due to its analytical nature, is typically difficult to implement for large and complex models. A few studies evaluate model robustness based on the model's decision boundary, but they suffer from low "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.18556","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.18556/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.18556","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.074756+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.18556v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.074756+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.18556","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.074756+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"P6KIYNMUEGJX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.074756+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.074756+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"P6KIYNMU","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.074756+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18519","citing_title":"LLM Safety From Within: Detecting Harmful Content with Internal Representations","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20704","citing_title":"Auto-ART: Structured Literature Synthesis and Automated Adversarial Robustness Testing","ref_index":47,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P6KIYNMU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/P6KIYNMU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.18556&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/P6KIYNMUEGJXCMP74C2Q5QSRI6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.074756+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:12.074756+00:00"}